(1) The proposed subdivision complies with all of the following, unless <br />specifically exempt from compliance through a code provision applicable to <br />a special area zone or overlay zone: <br />(a) EC 9.2000 through 9.4170 regarding lot dimensions and density <br />requirements for the subject zone and overlay zone. Within the /WR <br />Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone, no new lot may be <br />created if more than 33% of the lot, as created , would occupy either: <br />1. The combined area of the /WR conservation setback and <br />any portion of the Goal 5 Water Resource Site that extends <br />landward beyond the conservation setback; or <br />2. The /WQ Management Area. <br />Response: Responses to the applicable dimensional and density standards are provided in responses <br />to Sections 9.2740 through 9.2795 in this narrative. The site is outside the protected areas <br />in the Water Resource Conservation (WR) or Water Quality (WQ) Overlay Zones. These <br />criteria are met to the extent that they apply. <br />(b) EC 9.6800 through EC 9.6875 Standards for Streets, Alleys, and Other <br />Public Ways; and <br />Response: The new rowhouse lots are planned to be served by a private street, as shown on the <br />Preliminary Plans in Exhibit A. Due to the unique topography of the site, and to <br />accommodate the City's request that this facility be approved as a private street, the <br />Applicant is requesting relief from certain street standards afforded them under the <br />included PUD modification and cluster subdivision criteria. Responses to the specific <br />street standards are provided previously in this narrative, in response to Sections 9.6805 <br />through 9.6875. This criterion is met. <br />(c) EC 9.6500 through EC 9.6505 Public Improvement Standards. <br />Response: The public improvements planned to serve the project (primarily the construction of <br />Deerfern Road) are being reviewed as part of the East Highlands Subdivision final platting <br />process. Responses to the specific public improvement standards are provided previously <br />in this narrative, in Sections 9.6500 through 9.6505. This criterion is met. <br />(2) Approval does not impede the future best use of the remainder of the property <br />under the same ownership or adversely affect the development of the <br />remainder or any adjoining land or access thereto, based on the provisions of <br />this land use code. For subdivisions involving phasing, it shall be <br />demonstrated that each sequential phase will maintain consistency with the <br />provisions of EC 9.8515 Tentative Subdivision Approval Criteria - General. <br />Response: The property is being developed in accordance with the East Ridge Village PUD (PDF 02- <br />2), which accounts for development of the entire property. Therefore, there will be no <br />remainder. The proposal will allow the surrounding properties to continue to be <br />developed as planned under the PUD. This criterion is met. <br />(3) Any existing improvements on the proposed lots are consistent with the <br />provisions of this land use code. <br />Response: The subject site is vacant. Therefore, there are no existing improvements that would be <br />made inconsistent with the applicable standards in the land use code. This criterion does <br />not apply. <br />,~/►L7 East Highlands Lot 46 - City of Eugene November 2021 <br />PUD Modification, Cluster Subdivision, Property Line Adjustment and Page 35 <br />Slope Easement Vacation <br />