This description of the Director's decision is inaccurate. The Decision clearly <br />states that the bases for its finding of compliance with condition (c) is that "[a]ll public <br />accessways to the site are proposed to remain unchanged[,]" and that the "original approved <br />Shopko site plan (SR 88-11) showed the rear loading dock area connecting to the neighboring <br />parcel to east (now referred to as the CML property) in the same location." (Decision at 8.) <br />Thus, the Director is not approving a new cross-aisle. <br />The SR 88-11 documents plainly show that the Director's description of the <br />1988 Plans is correct. The 1988 Plans show the access point from the docks to the Crescent <br />Avenue lane and a truck turn-around area on the other side of the driveway: <br />it - .ans............, <br />SHUPKQ - P) <br />C-3f AC <br />PARCEL <br />. i = <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />. 1 <br />1 <br />f <br />.1 ~ <br />i 1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />Page 16 - WinCo Foods, LLC's Response to Appellants' Statements of Alleged Errors <br />CRESENT AVENUE <br />MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4816-6071-2143.6 <br />TELEPHONE: 503.224.5858 <br />3400 U.S. BANCORP TOR'ER <br />I11 S.W FIFTH AVENUE <br />P ORTLAND. OREGON 97204 <br />