My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Supplemental Materials #3
>
OnTrack
>
ZVR
>
2020
>
ZVR 20-1
>
Supplemental Materials #3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:06:42 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 2:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
ZVR
File Year
20
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Conte, Paul
Document Type
Supplemental Materials
Document_Date
1/6/2020
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rather than outright uses. This would allow proposed residential <br />developments to address preservation of the neighborhood character, <br />ample and usable open space, a variety of residential unit sizes, <br />attempts to use or preserve existing structures, rehousing displaced <br />residents, and a provision of units suitable for senior citizens and <br />special and low-income groups. He reiterated that the NAG favors <br />the concept of the Mixed-Use District and encouraged City Council <br />to specify R-4 density as a conditional use. <br />Neil Murray, 653 West Broadway, representing the Westside Neighbor- <br />hood Quality Project, said they endorse the mixed-use zoning as <br />proposed, and felt that zoning would enhance and be a fitting comple- <br />ment to commercial uses on the east and residential uses on the <br />west. However, the group had one reservation and felt using R-4 zoning <br />for some high-density development under conditional use would be <br />beneficial. The group felt the City is obligated to adopt a policy to <br />enhance the residential nature of the areas around the downtown. He <br />also said the group thought the Council's past action in calling <br />for residential uses of the area was a further commitment. He <br />urged Council to recognize this mixed-use zoning recommendation as a <br />compromise proposal. <br />Gerald A. Wilson, 670 West Broadway, said his property was adjacent <br />to this area, and felt the future of his property would relate to <br />the future of the area in the proposed rezoning. He supported the <br />mixed-use rezoning as it would be much more compatible than commercial <br />use. <br />Joan Gray, 1252 West 12th, expressed support for the mixed use as <br />recommended by the Planning Commission. She owned 2/5 of a block, <br />which is under consideration for rezoning from C-2 to mixed use. <br />She is planning to develop the property over the next two to three <br />years with a combination of residential and commercial use. She <br />expressed concern over the narrow restrictive commercial uses allowed <br />outright in existing structures and sanctioned for conditional use <br />in new construction. She said if the intent of the new rezoning is <br />to stimulate development of higher-density residential, then the <br />ordinance should provide a variety of commercial uses for the <br />residents in the area. She urged Council to amend Item No. 3 of the <br />Use Section to include commercial uses such as coffee shops, cafes, <br />bakeries, banks, delicatessens, variety stores, and meat markets. She <br />felt these uses would supply needed social centers and add to the life <br />in the area. She said it takes more than housing to attract people to <br />an area and make them want to stay, citing these additional commercial <br />uses would provide more amenities to the people. With the suggested <br />addition, she went on record as being in general support of new <br />commercial development which is aimed primarily at providing services <br />for the residents of the neighborhood. <br />0 <br />9/26/77--3 <br />Z26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.