My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Materials (1-2-20)
>
OnTrack
>
ZVR
>
2020
>
ZVR 20-1
>
Application Materials (1-2-20)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
1/2/2020 2:49:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
ZVR
File Year
20
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Conte, Paul
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
1/2/2020
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Prohibition of Secondary Dwellings' on Alley Access Lots <br />The relevant standards from the Eugene Code provide: <br />9.2741 Special Use Limitations for Table 9.2740. <br />(2) Secondary Dwellings. Secondary dwellings are only permitted in R-1 and <br />are subject to the standards beginning at EC 9.2750, except that new <br />secondary dwellings are prohibited on alley access lots. <br />9.2751 Special Development Standards for Table 9.2750. <br />(18) Alley Access Lots in R-1. <br />(a) General Standards. <br />2. Use Regulations. Alley access lots have the same land use <br />regulations as the base zone except that there is no allowance for <br />a secondary dwelling. <br />The prohibition on siting an accessory dwelling on an R-1 lot if the lot does not have street <br />frontage and can be accessed only from an alley is a regulation relating to siting. It relates <br />to the location of buildings, specifically those that are proposed for location on an alley; it <br />relates to the ground that may be occupied by an accessory dwelling. <br />ORS 197.312(5)(b) specifically makes the allowance of accessory dwellings subject to local <br />regulations. Although this regulation does make an accessory dwelling a prohibited use on <br />some lots, it is reasonable because it is necessary to addresses the impacts of a potential <br />doubling of the number of vehicular trips on city alleys that are not typically improved to a <br />level to support such traffic. It also helps ensure that the increased densities on these <br />inherently small lots do not create "livability" issues that arise when residential <br />neighborhoods become overcrowded with unregulated infill. Livability issues must be <br />balanced with growth for the welfare of a community's members. Goal 14 is "[t]o provide <br />for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, to accommodate urban <br />populations and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient <br />use of land, and to provide for livable communities." Development on alley access lots can <br />be more impactful to surrounding properties because they are generally small lots <br />surrounded by homes on three sides. The existing alleys are within the older <br />neighborhoods where there is a traditional grid pattern of blocks and streets along with <br />older homes that limits the location and overall size of alley access lots. The regulation is <br />an effective way to limit traffic on the city's alleys, many of which are unimproved, and to <br />address livability concerns associated with overcrowding. <br />Based on the above findings, this standard would apply to the proposed request. <br />2. Minimum Lot Size <br />The relevant standard from the Eugene Code provides: <br />z Eugene's code does not currently refer to "accessory" dwelling units. Under Eugene's code, an ORS <br />197.312(5)(b) "accessory dwelling unit" may be allowed in the R-1 zone as a "secondary dwelling." The land <br />use code defines "secondary dwelling" as "a dwelling unit that is located on the same lot as a primary one- <br />family dwelling that is clearly subordinate to the primary one-family dwelling, whether a part of the same <br />structure as the primary one-family dwelling or a detached dwelling unit on the same lot. Either the <br />secondary dwelling or the primary dwelling must be occupied by the property owner." Based on LUBA's <br />Order, the City considers the proposed use to be a "secondary dwelling" under the current code, and the City <br />would not apply the last sentence of the definition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.