I one would not hesitate to say that the tool shed was related to or connected with the <br />2 residence. A maintenance building is the apartment-complex equivalent of a tool shed. <br />3 As for exclusivity, the record is slim, but it is reasonable to infer that the maintenance <br />4 building will be used to store maintenance equipment, to facilitate work by maintenance <br />5 staff, and for resident bicycle storage. Those are nonpublic uses by the residents <br />6 themselves (bicycle storage) or by persons acting for the direct benefit of the residents <br />7 (maintenance of the apartment complex). To return to our prior example of a nonpublic <br />8 fitness center on the complex grounds, the maintenance building is akin to a pump room <br />9 for the swimming pool--it is an incidental use that facilitates the residents' use. LUBA <br />10 did not err with respect to the maintenance building. <br />11 INTERNAL PARKING CIRCULATION AREAS <br />12 The remaining issue is the two internal parking circulation areas. <br />13 Petitioners argue that they are "streets" under the code and therefore must be excluded <br />14 from the net-density calculation, while respondents argue that they are "parking drives" <br />15 under the code and therefore were properly included in the net-density calculation.' <br />16 It would be easier to describe the areas at issue by reference to the site plan, <br />17 but the site plan would be illegible if reproduced here, so we must rely on words. The <br />18 property is shaped similarly to the state of Nebraska. River Road runs north-south along <br />19 the western side of the proposed development. Lombard Street will be extended so that it <br />Petitioners do not dispute that, if the internal parking circulation areas qualify as <br />"parking drives," they were properly included in the net-density calculation. Because that <br />underlying legal issue is undisputed, we do not consider it and express no opinion on it. <br />13 <br />