I excluding `flagpole' portions of flag lots." (Boldface in original.) <br />2 EC 9.5500(11) contains multiple-family development standards and provides, in <br />3 part: <br />4 "(b) Driveways. Driveways and parking drives are private <br />5 roadways for projects or portions of projects not served by <br />6 streets. Driveways and parking drives shall be designed in <br />7 accordance with the following standards: <br />8 1. Driveways. Driveways provide vehicular access to <br />9 parking and dwelling units but do not provide primary <br />10 pedestrian access to units. Driveways are intended to <br />11 be used primarily for vehicular circulation and <br />12 dwelling access and should be visually distinct from <br />13 streets. * * * <br />14 "2. Parking Drives. Parking drives are driveways lined <br />15 with head-in parking spaces, diagonal parking spaces, <br />16 garages, or any combination thereof along a significant <br />17 portion of their length. Parking drives for multiple- <br />18 family developments with more than 20 units shall be <br />19 designed so as to permit no through-motor vehicle <br />20 movements. * * * <br />21 <br />22 "(e) Criteria for Adjustment. Adjustments to the standards in this <br />23 subsection may be made, based on the criteria of EC <br />24 9.8030(8)(e)." (Underscoring in original.) <br />25 The site plan includes two parking drives that permit internal traffic <br />26 circulation from access points at Lombard Lane and River Road. EC <br />27 9.5500(l 1)(b)(2) generally prohibits through motor vehicle movement in parking <br />28 areas of multi-family developments with more than 20 units. Lombard requested <br />29 and was allowed an adjustment for the planned parking drives that allow through <br />Page 7 <br />