I access points on River Road and the Lombard Street extension, and it is <br />2 undisputed that Lombard is required to provide adequate vision clearance at those <br />3 access points. However, the city did not err in concluding that EC 9.6780 does <br />4 not require Lombard to ensure adequate vision clearance area at the off-site <br />5 intersection of Fir Lane and Lombard Lane. <br />6 The third assignment of error is denied. <br />7 FOURTH ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />8 Buildings in the R-2 zone are limited to 100 feet in length, but that <br />9 limitation may be adjusted upon a finding that the design provides "multiple <br />10 entrances to buildings or yards" and creates "a vibrant street facade with visual <br />11 detail." EC 9.5500(6); EC 9.8030(8)(a).6 The city approved one building length <br />6 EC 9.5500(6) provides, in part: <br />"(a) Maximum Building Dimension. Neither the maximum length <br />nor width of any building within 40 feet of a front lot line can <br />exceed 100 feet in the R-1 and R-2 zones * * <br />"(c) Criteria for Adjustment. Adjustments to the standards in this <br />subsection may be made, based on criteria of EC <br />9.8030(8)(a)." (Underscoring in original.) <br />EC 9.8030(8)(a) provides: <br />"(8) Multiple-Family Standards Adjustment. Where this land <br />use code provides that the multiple-family standards may be <br />adjusted, the standards may be adjusted upon finding that the <br />design achieves all of the following: <br />Page 21 <br />