8 <br />1 ER-29 (Rec-24). Relevant to the "net density" issue is another Eugene Code <br />z provision that defines "street." EC 9.0500 defines street as follows: <br />3 "An improved or unimproved public or private way, other than an alley, that <br />4 is created to provide ingress or egress for vehicular traffic to one or more <br />5 lots or parcels, excluding a private way that is created to provide ingress or <br />6 egress to land in conjunction with the use of land for forestry, mining, or <br />7 agricultural purposes. A `street' includes the land between right-of-way lines <br />8 within the ingress/egress easement areas serving multiple residential lots but <br />9 excluding `flagpole' portions of flag lots." <br />10 <br />11 ER-29 (Rec-24). <br />12 EC 9.5500 defines "driveway" as "[t]he area located outside of the public <br />13 right-of-way that abuts the access connection and allows for vehicles to move or to <br />14 form a development site." ER-30 (Rec-25). <br />15 EC 9.5500(11)(b) defines "parking drive" to mean: <br />16 "Parking drives are driveways lined with head-in parking spaces, diagonal <br />17 parking spaces, garages, or any combination thereof along a significant <br />18 portion of their length. Parking drives for multiple-family developments <br />19 with more than 20 units shall be designed so as to emit no through motor <br />20 vehicle movements." <br />21 <br />22 ER-30 (Rec-25). <br />23 2. Petitioners argument below <br />24 <br />25 Petitioners argued below that the net density calculation under the EC <br />26 required additional areas of the property to be excluded from the property's net <br />27 density calculation. LUBA Rec-10-16, 215-225. Based on the plain text of the <br />28 EC, Petitioners argued that certain components of the development were not in <br />