This criterion does not apply as the PUD application does not propose a land division. <br />EC 9.8320(14): If the proposed PUD is located within a special area zone, the applicant shall <br />demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with the purpose(s) of the special area zone. <br />This criterion is not applicable as the subject property is not located within a special area zone. <br />EC 9.8320(15): For property with the /SR Site Review Overlay Zone, the PUD complies with any <br />additional site-specific criteria that were specified at the time the /SR designation was applied to the <br />property. <br />The /SR designation was applied to the subject site through the Oregon West Management, LLC Zone <br />Change (City File # Z 07-3). While the concurrent Refinement Plan Amendment proposal (City File # RA <br />07-1) resulted in site-specific changes to the River Road - Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (evaluated <br />above under EC 9.8320(2)), no site-specific criteria related to the /SR designation were applied. <br />Therefore, this criterion does not apply. <br />Section 2: Adiustment Review Evaluation <br />EC 9.8015 Adiustment Review - Purpose explains this process as encouraging design proposals that <br />respond to the intent of the code in an efficient and effective manner. EC 9.8020 Adiustment Review - <br />Applicability confirms that this process is available only where the land use code states that a specific <br />standard may be adjusted. <br />Staff confirms that the following standard is adjustable. EC 9.8020 also states that applications for an <br />adjustment review shall be considered under a Type II application process. However, in this case the <br />request is elevated to a Type III application process, so it can run concurrently with the Tentative PUD <br />application. <br />The applicant is requesting an adjustment to EC 9.2170(4)(b) regarding maximum front yard setbacks. <br />EC 9.2170(4) Setbacks. <br />(b) The maximum front yard setbacks stated in Table 9.2170 Commercial Zone General Building <br />Height and Setback Standards, shall apply only to new buildings and any building addition that <br />increases the length of the building facade facing a street, internal accessway, private drive, or <br />shopping street as defined in EC 9.2175(3) by at least 100%. For purposes of this subsection, <br />front yard setback may be measured from a public street or from the edge of the sidewalk <br />furthest from the curb of an internal accessway, private drive, or shopping street. In addition, <br />all new buildings and the portion of the development site specifically affected by the new <br />building are subject to the requirements of this subsection. <br />2. In C-2 and C-3, a minimum of 25% of all street facing facades must be within the specified <br />maximum front yard setback, or, orientation to an internal accessway, private drive, or <br />shopping street as defined in EC 9.2175(3) is permitted in compliance with EC <br />9.2173(4)(a). <br />4. Vehicular parking and circulation is not permitted in between the street and the portion <br />of the building that is used to comply with this subsection. <br />5. Buildings fronting on a street must provide a main entrance facing the street on any <br />June 2019 Staff Report: Santa Clara Transit Station - PDT 19-1/ARA 19-1 Page 20 of 23 <br />