I The final, and most difficult task, is to overlay the survey map (which <br />2 does not show the LDR/POS boundary) on the enlarged Metro Plan diagram <br />3 (which shows the LDR/POS boundary). We refer to such combined maps as <br />4 "overlaid diagrams." If the surveyed property boundaries matched up to any <br />5 features on the enlarged Metro Plan diagram, it would be relatively <br />6 straightforward to establish the location of the LDR/POS boundary on the <br />7 subject property, and hence the zoning boundary. However, in general the <br />8 surveyed property boundaries do not match up to any features on the enlarged <br />9 Metro Plan diagram. There are, however, several nearby features that can be <br />10 aligned with the other surveyed lines on the survey map. We refer to these <br />11 features depicted on the enlarged Metro Plan diagram as "referents." <br />12 Depending on how they are counted, in the area of the subject property there <br />13 are three to four referents that could be used to align the survey map onto the <br />14 enlarged Metro Plan diagram. Because all of the surveyed lines on the survey <br />15 map have an accurate relationship with each other, by matching up surveyed <br />16 lines and features located near the subject property, one can be reasonably <br />17 confident that the LDR/POS boundary is located as accurately as possible <br />18 within the boundaries of the surveyed property lines. One of the overlaid <br />19 diagrams is set out in an appendix to assist in understanding the relatively <br />The only apparent difference is greater fuzziness in the lines and boundaries <br />depicted on the paper 2004 Metro Plan diagram, compared to the crisper lines <br />and boundaries depicted on the digital version. In this opinion, all references <br />to the "2004 Metro Plan diagram" are to the official, paper version. <br />Page 7 <br />