1 concluded that the city limits line could not be considered, because it was "not <br />2 depicted on the Metro Plan diagram." Record 9. <br />3 LHVC argues that the hearings official erred in refusing to consider the <br />4 city limits line, because while not depicted on the enlarged Metro Plan <br />5 diagram, the city limits line in this area is a surveyed line that can be accurately <br />6 located along the boundaries of two features that are depicted on the enlarged <br />7 Metro Plan diagram: Spring Boulevard and the so-called "green finger." <br />8 According to undisputed testimony in the record, the city limits line is located <br />9 along the eastern boundary of Spring Boulevard, and borders the eastern and <br />10 northern boundary of a portion of the green finger, the base of which forms an <br />11 "L" shape. However, LHVC argues that Environ-Metal's overlaid diagram <br />12 Exhibit G, offsets the city limits line from its survey map to the northwest, so <br />13 that the line is located west of Spring Boulevard and west of the green finger <br />14 from the enlarged Metro Plan diagram. By contrast, LHVC argues, Schlieder's <br />15 maps, including overlaid diagram Sheet 9/2/15-04, locate the property <br />16 boundaries consistently with all referents, including the matchups between the <br />17 city limits line, Spring Boulevard, and the green finger, including the "L" shape <br />18 formed by its base. According to LHVC, the hearings official erred in failing <br />19 to consider matching the city limits line to Spring Boulevard and the green <br />20 finger as additional referents. <br />Page 35 <br />