1 04.2 Schlieder testified that Sheet 9/2/15-04 is an overlaid diagram using an <br />2 enlarged Metro Plan diagram based on the official paper 2004 Metro Plan <br />3 diagram. Sheet 9/2/15-04 purports to correct the "north arrow" problem and <br />4 the "sliding" problem identified in Schlieder's earlier testimony. Schlieder <br />5 argues that Sheet 9/2/15-04 overlays the surveyed lines shown on Environ- <br />6 Metal's survey map, including the East 30th Avenue centerline and the city <br />7 limits, with the associated features on the enlarged Metro Plan diagram in a <br />8 manner that matches all referents more closely than any of Environ-Metal's <br />9 diagrams. <br />10 C. The Hearings Official's Decision <br />11 On September 24, 2015, the hearings official issued his decision that <br />12 essentially chose to rely on Environ-Metal's Exhibit L, the two-degree rotated <br />13 diagram. The hearings official rejected Environ-Metal's arguments that the <br />14 two-degree tilt to the north arrow on the 2004 Metro Plan diagram is a <br />15 scrivener's error. <br />16 With respect to the Schlieder overlaid diagrams submitted on September <br />17 2, 2015, LHVC Sheet 9/2/15-01 through -05, the hearings official stated that <br />2 Sheets 9/2/15-01 and -02 are based on Environ-Metals' scans of the digital <br />Metro Plan diagram. Sheet 9/2/15-03 is a scan of the official paper 2004 Metro <br />Plan diagram, at the scale of one inch equals 7,000 feet, overlaid by the <br />property boundaries. However, at that scale, the subject property is almost <br />indiscernible. Sheet 9/2/15-05 is based on the digital Metro plan map, and is <br />overlaid with tax lot information. <br />Page 12 <br />