LUBA Final Opinion and Order dated November 20, 2018, LUBA Nos. 2018-074 and <br />2018-080, slip op at 38. <br />LUBA Final Opinion and Order dated November 20, 2018, LUBA Nos. 2018-074 and <br />2018-080, slip op at 39. <br />The apparent lack of evidence on this point [off-site impacts] may be the reason <br />that the planning commission felt compelled to modify Condition of Approval 10, <br />to require that all public improvements and building permits include a site- <br />specific geotechnical analysis that addresses, among other things, "potential off- <br />site impacts." <br />LUBA Final Opinion and Order dated November 20, 2018, LUBA Nos. 2018-074 and <br />2018-080, slip op at 39-40. <br />In the present case, however, the apparent lack of specific evidence and findings <br />in the present record regarding off-site impacts suggests that the modification to <br />Condition of Approval 10 was intended to overcome evidentiary insufficiencies in <br />determining compliance with EC 9.8320(6) and 9.9630(3)(c). <br />LUBA Final Opinion and Order dated November 20, 2018, LUBA Nos. 2018-074 and <br />2018-080, slip op at 40. <br />Planning Commission's Determination <br />For the reasons articulated above, the Planning Commission finds that the application complies <br />with EC 9.8320(6) and the South Hills Study's specific recommendations for development <br />standards related to review of on-site and off-site impact of the development. However, based <br />on the understanding that this area is geologically-sensitive, and for the reasons outlined <br />below, the Planning Commission also imposes the following Condition of Approval #110: <br />A geotechnical analysis from a certified engineer, with specific recommendations for <br />design and construction standards, shall be provided with any applications for Privately <br />Engineered Public Improvement (PEPI) permits, as well as building permits and site <br />development permits for the initial construction of infrastructure, and residences on <br />individual lots. The development proposed with each permit shall adhere to the <br />recommended standards for design and construction as contained in the applicant's <br />geotechnical analyses dated February 6, 2017 and May 14, 2019. <br />City Public Works staff has opined that the current industry practice is for a site-specific <br />Final Order: Capital Hill PUD (PDT 17-1) Remand Page 13 <br />