My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Exhibit N_Wetland Delineation Report
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2019
>
CA 19-1
>
Exhibit N_Wetland Delineation Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2019 5:12:58 PM
Creation date
4/19/2019 5:12:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
19
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Downtown Riverfront
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
4/19/2019
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM –Western Mountains, Valleys, and CoastRegion <br />Project/Site:Eugene waterfrontCity/County:Eugene/ Lane CountySampling Date:December 3, 2018 <br />Applicant/Owner:City of EugeneState: ORSampling Point:SP-03 <br />Investigator(s):Emily Alcott and Joe ParzychSection, Township, Range:T17SR3WSec 32NW <br />Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope (%):<2% <br />Subregion (LRR):A–NW ForestLat:44.053513Long:-123.083527Datum:WGS 84 <br />Soil Map Unit Name:Chapman-Urban land complexNWI classification:upland <br />Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YesNo(If no, explain in Remarks.) <br />Are Vegetation,Soil,or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed?Are “Normal Circumstances” present? YesXNo <br />Are Vegetation,Soil,or Hydrologynaturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) <br />SUMMARY OF FINDINGS –Attachsite map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. <br />Hydrophytic VegetationPresent?YesNoX <br />Hydric Soil Present?YesNoXIs the Sampled Area within a Wetland? YesNoX <br />Wetland Hydrology Present?YesNoX <br />Remarks: <br />VEGETATION –Use scientific namesofplants. <br />Dominance Test worksheet: <br />Absolute Dominant Indicator <br />Tree Stratum(Plot size:15’)% CoverSpecies?Status <br />Number of Dominant Species <br />That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:1(A) <br />1.70YFAC <br />Alnus rubra <br />Total Number of Dominant <br />2. <br />Species Across All Strata:3(B) <br />3. <br />Percentof Dominant Species <br />4. <br />That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:33%(A/B) <br />70= Total Cover <br />Prevalence Index worksheet: <br />Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:10’) <br />Total % Cover of:Multiply by: <br />1.15NFAC <br />Rubus armeniacus <br />OBL species0X1=0 <br />2.70YFACU <br />Hedra helix <br />3. <br />FACW species0X2=0 <br />4. <br />FAC species85X3=255 <br />5. <br />FACU species70X4=280 <br />85= Total Cover <br />UPL species0X5 =0 <br />Herb Stratum (Plot size:5’) <br />Column Totals:155(A) 535(B) <br />1.80Y <br />Poa spp <br />Prevalence Index = B/A =3.45 <br />2. <br />3. <br />Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br />4. <br />5. <br />1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <br />6. <br />2-Dominance Test is >50% <br />7. <br />3-1 <br />8. <br />4-Morphological Adaptations 1(Providesupporting <br />data in Remarks or on a separatesheet) <br />9. <br />5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants <br />1 <br />10. <br />Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) <br />1 <br />11. <br />80= Total Cover <br />Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must <br />1 <br />be present, unless disturbed or problematic. <br />Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) <br />1. <br />2. <br />Hydrophytic <br />= Total Cover <br />Vegetation <br />% Bare Ground inHerb Stratum20 <br />Present?YesNox <br />Remarks: <br />Riprap <br />US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast –Version 2.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.