WPlanning <br />Tentative Planned Unit Development <br />Completeness Review Form - Planning Division <br />Application File Name <br />Santa Clara Transit Station (PDT 19-1/ ARA 19-1)) <br />Date: <br />March 12, 2019 <br />Applicant's Narne: <br />Matt Imlach, Facilities Management Project Director, Lane <br />Transit District <br />Zoning: <br />C-2/SR/PD <br />C-1 <br />Representative's Name: <br />Colin McArthur, Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architecture & Planning <br />Reviewed by: <br />Jenessa Dragovich Phone: <br />(541) 682-8385 <br />E-mail: <br />JDragovich@eugene-or.gov <br />General - It is stated in the written statement that the entire site is C-2, however, a small portion of the site just north of <br />Comments: the existing building currently shows as C-1. Please clarify the inconsistency and address any standards related to <br />the use of the C-1 portion of the site. For reference, the Map/Tax Lot is 17041144/800. <br />Please review the attached checklist from Public Works . <br />Written Statement <br />Submittedr <br />Missing <br />Incomplete <br />N/A' <br />1. , Detailed written statement that, describes the proposed use of the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />property and'how the proposed planned unit'development satisfies all <br />applicable approval criteria (Section 9.8300 - 9.8310 and 9.8320 or <br />9.8325 of the Eugene Code). <br />2. Written statement includes the names, addresses, and telephone <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />numbers of the design team members, and designation of the <br />professional coordinator for the project. <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />3. Clearly states whether the application is to be reviewed under standard <br />or Needed Housing criteria. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />4. Clearly states whether site is included on City's acknowledged Goal 5 <br />inventory. <br />(1) Written statement concerns: <br />• Metro Plan policies F.18 and F.21 should also be addressed. <br />• At EC 9.8325(4) it is stated that there are not significant trees on the site, however, site plan sheet L-000 <br />shows three trees being removed. Please address the inconsistency between the plans and the written <br />Comments <br />statement. <br />(2) The design team listed by EC 9.8310(2)(b) requires an arborist. Staff notes that aerial photographs shows <br />trees near the existing structure noted as "off-site building to remain." For these trees it appears that removal is <br />intended based on the notes on sheet L-000. Please clarify if an arborist has been involved or if a request is being <br />made for waiver of this requirement. <br />Required Neighborhood/Applicant Meeting per,EC9.7007'& 9.7010 <br />Submitted <br />Missing <br />Incomplete <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />5. Submitted the list of persons who were mailed notice pursuant to EC 9.7007(5) <br />&a signed statement that notice was posted & mailed to those on the list. <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />6. Submitted a copy of the notice(see EC 9.7007(5)) <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />7. Submitted a copy of the meeting notes and sign-in sheet described at EC <br />9.7007(9); <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />8. Submitted copy of the site plan presented at the meeting. <br />9. Verify if site plan submitted with application substantially conforms to site <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />plan presented at neighborhood/applicant meeting (see EC 9.7007(12)). If not, <br />new meeting is required. <br />Comments: <br />(8) Please submit a copy of the site plan shown at the neighborhood meeting. <br />Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 1 of 4 <br />