1 west due to slopes and trees; and (3) a condition of approval requiring any trees <br />2 in buildable areas that are removed must be replaced at a one-to-one ratio. The <br />3 hearings official also noted that while lot locations and configuration must be <br />4 evaluated under EC 9.8320(3), no future buildings must be evaluated. 13 The <br />5 hearings official noted that future building construction will be subject to <br />6 review for compliance with R-1 zone development standards, as part of <br />7 building permit review, including any bulk or height standards, and that if the <br />8 applicant proposes to adopt Covenants, Conditions or Restrictions (CC&Rs) <br />13 The hearings official's decision states, in part: <br />"The [Neighbors] note that, to the extent the applicant relies upon <br />future CC&Rs [Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions] to <br />establish compliance with this (or any other) approval criterion, the <br />applicant has failed to establish compliance with the criterion. <br />However, neither EC 9.8320(3) nor any other PUD approval <br />criterion requires that the PUD include proposed buildings. While <br />the proposed lot locations and configurations must be evaluated for <br />compliance with this criterion, future buildings are not subject to <br />this review, and evaluation for compliance with this criterion does <br />not include consideration of those future buildings. At the time <br />residential dwellings are proposed for any of the approved lots, <br />they must be evaluated for compliance with the R-1 zone <br />development standards, and the bulk and height must be consistent <br />with those development standards. To the extent the developer <br />requests any deviations or modifications to those standards, those <br />requests would be subject to the city's review process. Thus, <br />compliance with this criterion does not rely on any specifications <br />that may be included in future CC&Rs." Record 82-83. <br />Page 44 <br />