My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Record 3 final rebuttal by applicant (10-17-18)
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2018
>
CU 18-1
>
Open Record 3 final rebuttal by applicant (10-17-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2018 3:35:50 PM
Creation date
10/17/2018 3:35:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
U of O North Campus
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
10/17/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Virginia Gustafson Lucker, Hearings Official <br />October 17, 2018 <br />Page 11 <br />H.Annual Reporting <br />Opponents arguments: <br />The Citys S-RP zone rules require annual reporting to the City <br />regarding uses in the S-RP zone in order to verify that the land in the zone is being used <br />primarily for University activities and other compatible private activities. See EC 9.3710 and <br />9.3730. Opponent Mr. Hancock asserts that the University has not provided this annual reporting <br />and argues that therefore the Hearings Official should deny the Universitys application for the <br />Plan. See Oct 3 Hancock letter at Issue 3. <br />Universitys response: <br />As explained in the Universitys October 10 second open record <br />period package, the University did submit annual reports to the City during the previous CUP <br />period, and the University agrees to provide annual reports following City approval of the <br />current Plan. The University therefore will comply with EC 9.3730, though this is not an <br />applicable criterion for the CUP and the Greenway permits that are the subject of this <br />proceeding. <br />III.Conclusion <br />For the reasons described above, and in theapplication and supplemental materials <br />submitted by the University in this proceeding, the Universityrespectfullyrequests that the <br />Hearings Official approve the Universitys application. <br />Sincerely, <br />MICHAEL J. GELARDI <br />MJG:mp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.