My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony (Open Record 2, 10-3-18 to 10-10-18)
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2018
>
CU 18-1
>
Public Testimony (Open Record 2, 10-3-18 to 10-10-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 2:11:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2018 2:11:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
U of O North Campus
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
10/12/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GIOELLO Nick R <br />From:Just Greg <gregringer@msn.com> <br />Sent:Tuesday, October 09, 2018 12:05 PM <br />To:GIOELLO Nick R <br />Cc:WOLLING Sue (SMTP) <br />UO 30-year conditional use permit <br />Subject: <br />IstronglyopposetheUO'sapplicationfora30yearconditionalusepermittofurtherdevelopthebanksofthe <br />WillametteRiverforcampusactivitiesbettersitedelsewhere. <br />Morethantwodecadesago,asagraduatestudentatUO,Irecallthetremendousdebatewithinthecampus <br />communityandthecityaboutthewisdomofconstructingtheriverfrontresearchpark.TheUOpromisedan <br />infusionoffunds,jobs,andresearchopportunitiesasrenownfacultyandcompanieswouldrelocateto <br />Eugene.Instead,thefirsttenantswerelocalcompaniesthatmigratedfromelsewhereinthecity,andthe <br />imaginedprofitsandscopeoftheresearchparkhaveyettofullymaterialize. <br />Subsequently,asaprofessorandenvironmentaleducatoratUO,Icontinuedtomonitorthedebateoverthe <br />"best"useofourriverfront.Eachtime,thedecisionfavoredfurtherencroachment,againwiththefalse <br />assertionthatbuildings,roads,andplayingfieldswillhaveminimalimpact.Timehasprovedthisclaimwrong. <br />Ourrivermaynotbewildorpristinenature,butthatisduetoourownarroganceandignoranceofthe <br />qualitativevalueoftheWillamette.Instead,ourdebatecontinuestodwellupontheexpectedquantityofjobs <br />andprofits. <br />Itistimetoreversethismindset.WecandobetterthantheUOproposes.TheWillamettecertainlydeserves <br />better.Iencouragedenialoftheconditionalusepermit,infavorofanenvironmental"revisioning"ofthe <br />river'splaceoncampus. <br />GregRinger,PhD <br />CourtesyProfessor,UniversityofOregon <br />988LincolnSt <br />Eugene,OR97401 <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.