UNIVERSITY OF OREGON <br />NORTH CAMPUS <br />CONDITIONAL USE & WILLAMETTE GREENWAY PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> <br />height limitations specified along the Willamette River. Building <br />setbacks shall be varied to avoid the effect of a continuous wall <br />along the minimum setback line and to adhere to the requirement <br />for protection of designated features (i.e., Millrace and pedestrian <br />linkage to the Autzen Stadium footbridge). <br />As noted, the Applicant has established a Regulatory Plan, Sheet L01 Exhibit A, that applies more <br />self-imposed, stringent development regulations than is required by code in order to facilitate <br />riparian restoration, open space improvements, and for viewsheds to be protected. For example, <br />the Applicant has established regulations regarding maximum building coverage that limit the <br />height and bulk of development in consideration of open space preservation. North of the tracks, <br />the Applicant is proposing maximum building coverages well below what is allowed by the code. <br />The applicable S-RP zone states that at least 40% of the portion of the development site shall be <br />shall be landscaped with living plant materials, requiring the building coverage and site elements to <br />be contained within 60% of the development site (implying an allowed building coverage of 40% <br />to 50%). To the west of the Millrace (Area 4), the Applicant proposes a maximum building <br />coverage of 15%; to the east of Riverfront Parkway (Area 6), the Applicant proposes a maximum <br />building coverage of 16%. Between the Millrace and the Riverfront Parkway (Area 5), the <br />Applicant proposes a maximum building coverage of 0.5%, and maximum field coverage of 47%. <br />The maximum building coverage to the south of the tracks is proposed to comply with existing S- <br />RP coverage standards. <br /> <br />In addition, the Applicant has established maximum building heights north of the tracks that are <br />well below the code allowance. The applicable S-RP zone states that there is no height limitation <br />for a structure outside 75 feet of the top of the south bank of the Willamette River. As the <br />Applicant proposes that all development occur outside the 100-foot setback, theoretically no <br />building height maximums are applicable by code. The applicant proposes a 45-foot maximum <br />building height to the west of the Millrace (Area 4), and a 37-foot maximum east of Riverfront <br />Parkway (Area 6). In the land between the Millrace and Riverfront Parkway (Area 5), the applicant <br />is proposing a 15-foot height limit to allow for the potential construction of recreation and outdoor <br />classroom support facilities. For areas south of the tracks, the Applicant has established a <br />maximum building height of 85 feet, which would allow for a range of building heights similar to <br />campus buildings across Franklin Boulevard. <br /> <br />Outside of development regulations imposed by the Applicant, it is important to note that the open <br />space preservation within the site is also supplemented by additional state regulations. The <br />Willamette River adjacent to the development site is identified as a Goal 5 Water Resource. The <br />Willamette River is a Category A resource, meaning it is designated for protection with a required <br />100-foot setback. In addition, the development site contains a Category A Wetland, labeled site <br />WR-4 on the Goal 5 Inventory. This Riverfront Park/Millrace wetland requires a setback of 50 feet. <br />Both of these setbacks have been incorporated in site design by the Applicant on Sheet L01 <br />Regulatory Plan (Exhibit A). In addition, protection of significant riparian vegetation is ensured <br />through existing established /WR protection provisions in EC 9.4900-9.4980, which are not <br />affected by the proposal. <br />The above findings demonstrate that proposal includes varied setbacks, that building development <br />will not result in a continuous wall along the setback, and that open space and riparian area <br />conservation recommendations ensure protection of designated features. Therefore, this criterion <br />is satisfied. <br />Cameron McCarthy FINAL SUBMITTAL | Revised August 13, 2018 80 <br /> <br />