My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony by 6-20-18
>
OnTrack
>
WG
>
2018
>
WG 18-3
>
Testimony by 6-20-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2018 11:15:17 AM
Creation date
6/21/2018 11:15:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
WG
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
Lombard Apartments
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
6/20/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOHNER Rodney T <br />From:Robert Bolman <robert.bolman@comcast.net> <br />Sent:Tuesday, June 19, 2018 10:15 AM <br />To:BOHNER Rodney T <br />Subject:Non Visionary Developments <br />Hello, <br />I generally support the thoughts and feelings of the activists opposing the proposed development <br />between River Road and the river. At the same time, I support the need for greater density so as to <br />support functional public transit. But why do these developments in Eugene always seem to be <br />carried out by out-of-town or out-of-state developers? Is there no one in Eugene capable of <br />building multi-unit housing? And what about truly visionary developments - taking into <br />consideration the precarious state of "civilization"? For example, the insistence on off-street <br />parking flies right in the face of Climate Change. We will be running out of fossil fuels within the <br />projected lifespan of any new construction. Are provisions being made for food production, <br />renewable energy, rainwater collection, composting, community, resource sharing, etc? Insisting <br />that the "wise and invisible hand of the free market" should decide things for us is <br />ridiculous. Please bring a degree of vision and leadership to the development process. <br />Sincerely, <br />Robert Bolman <br />The Lombard development proposal needs to be denied due to: <br />Lack of compliance with “clear & objective” standards of the Eugene code as evidenced by the applicant’s numerous <br />requests for adjustments. <br />Lack of traffic analysis for the dangerous implications of increased usage of River Road and adjacent neighborhood lanes. <br />Public lands need public process! Thank you for your consideration of this request to protect our precious Willamette River <br />Greenway. <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.