My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony by 6-20-18
>
OnTrack
>
WG
>
2018
>
WG 18-3
>
Testimony by 6-20-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2018 11:15:17 AM
Creation date
6/21/2018 11:15:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
WG
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
Lombard Apartments
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
6/20/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOHNER Rodney T <br />From:Dennis Sandow <dsandow@earthlink.net> <br />Sent:Friday, June 15, 2018 11:05 AM <br />To:BOHNER Rodney T <br />Subject:Lombard Apartment Transportation issues: Public testimony <br />HelloRodney, <br />Iwouldliketorequestthatthisbeplacedinthepublicrecordanddistributedtostafffortheirconsiderationpriorto <br />theirJune20recommendations. <br />TheproposedLombardApartmentdevelopmentwillimpactathreeplusacreparcelofopenlandadjacenttoour <br />neighborhood.SandwichedbetweensingleresidencesoneithersideandtheWillametteRiverandRiverRoadthe <br />developmentwillcertainlyhaveasocialimpact,notonlytousbuttothecitizensofEugene. <br />TheproposeddevelopmentwilluseRiverRoad,FirLaneandLombardLaneforaccess.WithinthedevelopmentLombard <br />LanewillbeЋЉwidewithaЍЎpublicrightofway.ThiswillconnecttotheexistingLombardandFirLanesthatare <br />approximatelyЊЏandЊВwide.Currentlybothlanescanonlyaccommodateasinglelaneoftraffic. <br />WhileIunderstandthatatrafficimpactstudyisnotrequiredforlessthan100units,Ialsounderstandthatsuchcriteria <br />areestablishedforaverageornormaltrafficstatistics.Thecurrentneighborhoodtrafficpatternisfarfromnormal.This <br />isevidencedbytheCityofEugene'sinvestmentinthepedestrian/cycliststriplocatedonthenorthsideofFirLane. <br />Theseunusualcircumstances,makethecaseforathoroughtrafficstudyansweringquestionssuchas: <br />1.WhataretheleftturnwaittimesfromFirLaneontoRiverRoad? <br />2.WhataretheleftturnwaittimesfromtheproposeddevelopedontoRiverRoad? <br />3.WhataretheleftturnwaittimesfromRiverRoadontoFirLane? <br />3.aHowwilltheexistingleftturnlanefromRiverRoadtoFirLanethatcurrentlyaccommodatesonecaronlybe <br />impacted? <br />4.HowwillthedevelopmentimpacttheexistingLombardandFirLanes? <br />TothelastpointIwouldliketoaddtwopoints. <br />1.YourpredecessorAltheaSullivantoldmethatshehadassumedthattherewouldbenoimpactonLombardandFir <br />andthattheywouldremainastheyare. <br />2.Despitemultiplerequeststoplanning,publicworksandthecountyfordataconcerningtheimpactofthe <br />developmentonFirandLombardLane,asoftoday6/15/18therehasbeennotoneresponse.InaconversationwithCity <br />publicworks,weweretoldthatwewouldhavetowaitforthedecisionsfromtheupcominghearingtofindoutwhatthe <br />impactsare.Howcanwe,thepublic,prepareforthehearingwhentheimpactswillbedeterminedbythehearing?This <br />circularlogicunderminesthecitizenscapacitytoengageplannersbecauseweareuninformedbytheplanning <br />community. <br />Sincerely, <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.