My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony Received 5-21-18 to 5-22-18
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Testimony Received 5-21-18 to 5-22-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2018 2:26:38 PM
Creation date
6/1/2018 2:26:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
Capital Hill PUD
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
5/23/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Goal 5 program in the Metro Plan for Scenic Sites. See page 1: <br />address how development of the sites inclu <br />at the same time preserving their natural scenic values. In this context it appears that the <br />provisions of EC 9.6710 may yet be applicable. Otherwise, there is no guidance on how <br />Dr. Sch <br />Technical Review, Geotechnical/Geologic Assessment and Addendum, Capital <br />th <br />Hill PUD, Branch Engineering (Feb 6, and May 30, 2017) paragraph: <br />ȏ <br />But on page 20 of the Staff Report staff indicates "...the subject property is included on the <br />City’s acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, per the April 12,1978 Scenic Sites Working Paper... <br />". However, that working paper and its presumed map is not in evidence, and nowhere to be <br />found on the City's web site. In fact, none of the information about Goal 5 resources on the City's <br />web site includes the subject property.”(Emphasis added). <br /> <br />Lane County, Springfield, and Eugene jointly completed the Goal 5 requirements for wildlife habitat <br />for the area between the UGB and the Plan Boundary. The inventory consisted of data from the <br />Oregon Natural Heritage Program and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, which <br />included: threatened, endangered, and sensitive wildlife species habitat information; sensitive bird <br />site inventories; and wildlife species of concern and/or habitats of concern identified and mapped by <br />the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The Goal 5 wetland and riparian corridor requirements <br />for the area between the UGB and the Plan Boundary adequately address fish habitat. Consequently, <br />for purposes of applying Goal 5 requirements to this portion of the metro area, wildlife does not <br />include fish habitat. Significant wildlife habitat includes only those sites where one or more of the <br />following conditions exist: the habitat has been documented to perform a life support function for <br />wildlife species listed by the federal government as a threatened or endangered species or by the <br />State of Oregon as a threatened, endangered, or sensitive wildlife species; the habitat has <br />documented occurrences of more than incidental use by a threatened, endangered, or sensitive <br />wildlife species; the habitat has been documented as a sensitive bird nesting, roosting, or watering <br />resource site for osprey or great blue herons; the habitat has been documented to be essential in <br />achieving policies or population objectives specified in a wildlife species management plan <br />III-C-10 <br />adopted by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission; or the area is identified and mapped by the <br />Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife as habitat for a wildlife species of concern. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.