application exempts the future land division application from compliance with state or local <br />surveying requirements. <br />As required by the tentative subdivision approval criteria at EC 9.8515(12), subsequent land <br />division applications must be consistent with the approved PUD. While not required under the <br />City's code, given the extent of final design and construction details that will be coordinated <br />through the subsequent subdivision application(s) and related permit review processes, the <br />planning staff have highly recommended that the applicant submit the final PUD application for <br />Capital Hill PUD concurrent with the tentative subdivision application. As the staff note, this <br />will facilitate coordination of those subsequent reviews and numerous technical details to ensure <br />consistency with the approved tentative PUD. <br />EC 9.8320(14): If the proposed PUD is located within a special area zone, the <br />applicant shall demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with the purpose(s) of <br />the special area zone. <br />Finding: The subject property is not located within a special area zone and, therefore, this <br />criterion is not applicable. <br />EC 9.8320 (15) For property with the /SR Site Review Overly Zone the PUD <br />complies with any additional site-specific criteria that were specified at the time the <br />/SR designation was applied to the property. <br />Finding: The property does not have the /SR Site Review Overlay Zone and, therefore, this <br />criterion is not applicable. <br />DECISION <br />Based on the above analysis and findings, and subject to the conditions noted above, the hearings <br />official APPROVES the application for the Capital Hill PUD. <br />Virginia Gustafson Lucker <br />Hearings Official <br />Dated this 20th day April, 2018. <br />Mailed this day of April, 2018. <br />SEE NOTICE OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL DECISION FOR STATEMENT OF APPEAL <br />RIGHTS <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 17-1) 79 <br />