My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hearings Official Decision
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Hearings Official Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2018 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
5/15/2018 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Decision Document
Document_Date
5/15/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To the extent EC 9.6710 requirements serves as guidance for the preparation of complete <br />geological and geotechnical analyses, the applicant's preliminary investigation complies with <br />those requirements. <br />(e) EC 9.6730 Pedestrian Circulation On-Site. <br />Finding: The EC 9.6730 standards for on-site pedestrian circulation are generally applicable to <br />institutional, office, commercial, multi-family residential and industrial PUDs. These standards <br />are not applicable to the proposed single-family residential PUD. <br />(f) EC 9.6735 Public Access Required. <br />(1) Except as otherwise provided in this land use code, no building or <br />structure shall be erected or altered except on a lot fronting or <br />abutting on a public street or having access to a public street over a <br />private street or easement of record approved in accordance with <br />provisions contained in this land use code. <br />Finding: Each of the proposed lots have frontage on a public street or have access to a public <br />street via a private street or shared access easement. Access to Lots 5-10 and 16-19 will be <br />provided via 20-foot-wide shared access easements. The Response Committee urges that these <br />shared access easements should be required to have sidewalks. However, not only would those <br />additional improvements require added grading and removal of vegetation, EC 9.6735 does not <br />warrant that additional development. As noted above, the future subdivision application process <br />will include a required review and approval of a joint access easement and maintenance <br />agreement to be recorded concurrent with the final plat. <br />(2) Access from a public street to a development site shall be located in <br />accordance with EC 7.420 Access Connections - Location. If a <br />development will increase the development site's peak hour trip <br />generation by less than 50% and will generate less than 20 additional <br />peak hour trips, the development site's existing access connections are <br />exempt from this standard. <br />The proposed development is subject to the applicable standards at EC 7.420 and will comply as <br />addressed in the following findings. <br />EC 7.420 Access Connections - Location <br />(1) Access Connections to all Street Classifications. Access connections <br />to all street classifications shall be located in accordance with the <br />following standards: <br />(a) No access connection shall be located to encompass a municipal <br />utility. An access connection may encompass a municipal utility if <br />the applicant either: <br />1. Executes a public utility easement for the encompassed municipal <br />utility; or <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 17-1) 69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.