My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hearings Official Decision
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Hearings Official Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2018 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
5/15/2018 12:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Decision Document
Document_Date
5/15/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
provides that its policies apply to properties located south of 18th Avenue and above 500 <br />feet in elevation. Consequently, as properties located south of 18th Avenue and above 500 <br />feet annex into the City, they become subject to the SHS. The property that is the subject <br />of this application is located within the City, south of 18th Avenue and above 500 feet; <br />therefore, the property is now subject to the SHS, even if it would not have been subject <br />to the SHS when the SHS was originally adopted. <br />The resolution adopting the SHS (Resolution 2295, adopted June 10, 1974) provides that <br />the SHS is "applicable to that area identified in the study as being south of 18th Avenue, <br />above an elevation of 500 feet." The SHS did not (and does not today) include a map <br />showing specific plan boundaries. <br />Neither the SHS nor Resolution 2295 limit the footprint of the SHS to properties that <br />were located within the city limits at the time the Resolution was adopted. Consequently, <br />over time, as properties (including portions of the subject property) annexed into the City, <br />if those properties were located south of 18th Avenue and above 500 feet, those properties <br />because subject to the SHS." <br />The hearings official accepts the City attorney's statement and rejects the applicant's argument <br />that the South Hills study does not apply to this application. <br />2. Evaluation of Applicable Approval Criteria <br />As stated above, the applicant has elected to seek approval of the requested PUD under the <br />General PUD approval criteria at EC 9.8320. Those criteria require evaluation of the requested <br />PUD as follows: <br />EC 9.8320(1) The PUD is consistent with applicable adopted policies of the <br />Metro Plan. <br />Finding: The Metro Plan text and diagram designate the subject property as "Low Density <br />Residential." As described in Metro Plan Residential Land Use and Housing Policy A.9, Low <br />Density Residential development includes development up to 10 dwelling units per acre. The <br />subject property is zoned R-1, which is consistent with the current Metro Plan designation.' The <br />proposed development consists of 34 residential lots with two lots having the option to construct <br />up to three units each for a total of 34 to 38 dwelling on 13.63 acres. This results in a gross <br />density between 2.6 to 2.9 units per acre, well within the range indicated under the Metro Plan. <br />Numerous area residents expressed concern that the proposed density is too high for the subject <br />property, citing the property's topography, natural features, proximity to Hendricks Park and the <br />Ribbon Trail, and its visible, South Hills location. However, the appropriateness of the Metro <br />Plan designation is not at issue. This property is designated for low density urban residential <br />6 EC 9.2700 states that "the purpose of the R-1 Low-Density residential zone is to implement the Metro Plan by <br />providing areas for low density residential use. The R-1 zone is designed for one-family dwellings with some <br />allowance for other types of dwellings and is also intended to provide a limited range of non-residential uses that can <br />enhance the quality of low density residential areas." <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 17-1) 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.