My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3rd Open Record Period: Applicant’s final rebuttal (4-6-18)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
3rd Open Record Period: Applicant’s final rebuttal (4-6-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 3:49:29 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 3:49:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
4/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Hearing Official <br />April 6, 2018 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />2. The 1.48-acre Staff Partition Tract cannot be partitioned alone in order to avoid the <br />PUD process because the code prohibits developing that 1.48-acre tract standing alone; the <br />adjacent property in the same ownership must be included, and that triggers a PUD. <br /> <br />EC 9.8210(2) governs applications for partitions and requires that Applications include all <br />contiguous property under the same ownership as the subject property, and are signed by the <br />owner of the property., the -acre chunk of the <br />larger ownership, cannot, as a matter of law, be partitioned separately from the balance of the <br />circumvent <br />1 <br />clear and objective standards is a <br /> <br />As the balance of the adjacent property must be included in any partition application, it is plainly <br />clear that a PUD approval is needed when the relevant dots in the code are connected. <br /> <br />The applicability standards for the PUD process appear at EC 9.8305 and capture this site when <br />the code language in 9.8210(2), quoted above, is honored and the all of the property in the same <br />ownership is considered together. EC 9.8305 provides, in relevant part: <br /> <br />Applicability <br />. PUD provisions shall be applied when any of the following <br />conditions exist: <br />(1) <br /> The proposal is subject to review and approval through the PUD process <br />according to an adopted refinement plan, including but not limited to, property <br />within the boundary of the South Hills Study where all or a portion of a <br />development site is: <br />(a) Between an elevation of 500 feet and 701 feet, and the <br />development site is at least 4 acres with areas of the development site <br />containing slopes that exceed 20%. <br />(b) On property above 701 feet in elevation, except partitions that do <br />not include the creation of a public street, unless an alternate review <br />procedure is approved pursuant to EC 9.9630(3)(a). <br />(c) Above an elevation of 900 feet, except for a land division <br />undertaken by or on behalf of a governmental entity in order to <br />preserve, manage, or expand park, open space, or natural resource <br /> <br /> <br />bold italicbold italic <br />The in (c) above is triggered here. The language in (b) above is potentially <br />triggered if a new street is required in connection with the partition. <br /> <br />In summary, if the owner of the Staff Partition Tract were to apply tomorrow for a simple <br />partition of just that 1.48 acres under the clear and objective standards of EC 9.8220, the City <br />staff response to that application in the completeness review process would be: <br /> <br /> <br />1 Walter Matthau (as Sen. Russell Long) to Kevin Costner (as D.A. Jim Garrison) in J.F.K. (1991). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.