Application Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

The applicant requests an adjustment to EC 9.5500(11)(b)(2) as described above in Part III of this document. Where the central parking drive around Building 2 provides a through-motor vehicle movement enhanced landscape buffers and pedestrian crosswalks will minimize the negative aspects of parking uses. The drives are designed to meet all other requirements of section EC 9.5500(11) and EC9.8030(8)(e). The Applicant requests an adjustment to section EC 9.5500(12)(b)1. as described in Part III of the above document where more than 3 consecutive parking courts exist. In accordance with EC 9.8030(8)(f) continuous parking drives are limited to the internal vehicular circulation needed to meet the intent of EC 9.6815 and provide efficient connectivity for emergency service vehicles in readily apparent paths without creating excessive travel lengths; individual parking courts within the project are of sizes and widths that do not exceed those stipulated in EC 9.5500(12)(b) and are punctuated and/or separated by landscape islands to further aid in limiting their apparent sizes; and enhanced landscape buffers and pedestrian crosswalks will minimize the negative aspects of parking uses. The Applicant also requests an adjustment to Section EC 9.5500(12)(c) to allow parking between Lombard Street and Building 1. While the Applicant believes that the intent of the Code is only to restrict parking in front of primary buildings directly facing the street, out of an abundance of caution the Applicant requests this adjustment. The location of Building 1 to the parking provided does not erode any achievement of EC 9.8030(8)(f)1, 2, or 3 standards in any way that would be different as the parking requires driveway entrances from Lombard Street as shown regardless of the location of Building 1. 37 | Page LOMBARD APARTMENTS LLC –WRITTEN STATEMENT – APRIL 5, 2018