|
Implementing pedestrian safetv interventions
<br />Attachment C
<br />Attachment B
<br />37. Page Y, Foret-Bruno JY, Cary S. Are expected and observed efectiveness ofemergency brake assist in preventing
<br />road injury accidents consistent? Washington DC, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, zoos
<br />(Report no o5-oz68).
<br />38. Anderson RWG et al. Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian crashes. Accident Analysis &
<br />Prevention, 1997,19 (5): 667-674.
<br />39. Anderson RWG et al. Potential benefits offorward collision avoidance technology. Department of Transport
<br />and Main Roads, Queensland, Brisbane (CASRto6), zo1z.
<br />4o.Anderson RWG. Integrating the assessment of pedestrian safety in vehicles with collision detection and
<br />mitigation systems. Proceedingof2oi2 IRCOBI Conference, Dublin, 11-14 September 1011, pp75I-76o.
<br />41. Rosen E et al. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2.010, 4z
<br />(6):1949-1957-
<br />4z. Grover C et al. Automated emergency brake systems: Technical requirements, costs and benefits. Crowthorne,
<br />Transportation Research Laboratory, zoo8 (TRL Published Project Report PPR 117).
<br />43. Global NCAP. Promoting safer cars worldwide [website] (http://www.globalncap.org/NCAPProgrammes/
<br />Pages/GlobaINCAP.aspx, accessed 11 October zolz).
<br />44.EuroNCAP. Pedestrian testingprotocol: version S.3.r. Brussels, European New Car Assessment Programme, zo17,.
<br />45. 1998Agreement on global technical regulations [website]. (http://wNvw.unece.org/trans/main/wpz9/
<br />wpigwgs/wpz9$en/wpz9glob.html, accessed 16 January 7,013).
<br />46. McLean AJ. Vehicle design far pedestrian protection. Adelaide, University of Adelaide Centre for Automotive
<br />Safety Research, zoos (CASR037).
<br />47. Long AD, Ponte G, Anderson RWG. The CASR pedestrian crash analysis: at-scene investigation, computer
<br />simulation and sub-system reconstruction. Journal ofBiornecbanics, 2,007, 40(Sz): S%16.
<br />48. improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. Geneva, UNECE, EEVC
<br />Working Group 17 Report, 1998 with zooz updates (www.unece.org/trans/doc/2.oo6/wpiggrsp/ps-i87c.doc,
<br />accessed 16 January 2.013).
<br />49. Haider AH et al. Mechanism of injury predicts case fatality and functional outcomes in pediatric trauma
<br />patients: the case for its use in trauma outcomes studies.Journal of 'Pediatrir Surgery, zon, 46: 1557-1563_
<br />so. Chakravarthy B et al. Pediatric pedestrian injuries: emergency care considerations. Pediatric Emergency Care,
<br />2,007, 7,3: 738-744
<br />51. Earlam R. Trauma helicopter. [website] (http://www.richardeartam.com/TraumaHelicopter.htmi, accessed
<br />z7, January 1013).
<br />51. European Road Safety Observatory. [website] (www.erso.cu, accessed 16 January 7 o13).
<br />53. Hartl R et al. Direct transport within an organized state trauma system reduces mortality in patients with
<br />severe traumatic brain injury. Journal ofTraurna, zoo6, 6o: 1z5o-1z56.
<br />54. Sasser S et al. Pre-hospital trauma care systems. Geneva, World Health Organization, zoos.
<br />55. Utter GH et al. Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured?Journal
<br />of Trauma, zoo6, 6o: 519-535•
<br />56. Ali J et al. Trauma outcome improves following the advanced trauma life support program in a developing
<br />country. Journal of] Trauma, 1993, 34: 89o-898.
<br />57. Collicott PE, Hughes I. Training in advanced trauma life support. Journal ofAmerican Medical Association,
<br />1980,143: 1156-u59.
<br />58. Mock C et al. Essential trauma careguidelines. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2004.
<br />59. Trauma system agenda for the future [website] (http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/ems/
<br />emstraumasystcM03/vision.htm, accessed 7,1 September zolz).
<br />6o. World report on disability. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1011.
<br />61. Petridou E et al. Injuries among disabled children: a study from Greece. Injury Prevention, 1003, 9: 1z6-7,30.
<br />67,. Leff M et al. Disability, environmental barriers, and non-fatal injury. Injury Prevention, zo1o, 16: 411-415•
<br />63. Sinclair SA, Xiang H. Injuries among US children with different types of disabilities. American Journal of
<br />Public Health, zoo8, 98: 151o-1516.
<br />64. Xiang HY et al. Nonfatal injuries among US children with disabling conditions. American Journal of Public
<br />Health, zoos, 95: 1970-1975.
<br />65. Roberts 1, Norton R. Sensory deficit and the risk of pedestrian injury. Injury Prevention, 1995,1: 12-14.
<br />66. Mitullah W, Makajuma G. Analysis ofnon-motorised travel conditions on Jogoo road corridor in Nairobi. Cape
<br />Town, African Centre of Excellence for Studies in Public and Non-Motorised Transport, 1oo9 (Working Paper).
<br />92
<br />Page 238
<br />
|