|
Attach
<br />Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners
<br />Attach
<br />17. Knaap KK, Giese K. Guidelines for the conversion of urban four-lane undivided roadways to tbree-lane two-way
<br />left-turn facilities. Ames, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, zoos.
<br />z8. Huang HE Stewart J R, Zegeer CV. Evaluation of lane reduction "road diet" measures on crashes and injuries.
<br />Transportation Research Record, zooz, 1784: 80-90.
<br />z9. Gattis JL. Urban street cross section and speed issues. Transportation ResearchE-Circular, zooo (http://trid.
<br />trb.org/view.aspx?id=686641, accessed 2,9 December zoiz).
<br />3o. Fitzpatrick K, et al. Design factors that affect driver speed on suburban streets. Transportation Research
<br />Record, 2,001, 1751:18-z5.
<br />31. Mahalel D, Szternfeld Z. Safety improvements and driver perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1986,
<br />18: 37-42,.
<br />32,. Untermann RK. Street design - reassessing the function, safety, and comfort of streets for pedestrians. In:
<br />Proceedings of the rith International Pedestrian Conference: The Road Less Traveled: Getting Deere by Other
<br />Means, Boulder, 3-6 October 199o. Boulder, The Division, 199o: 19-2,6.
<br />33. Garder PE. The impact of speed and other variables on pedestrian safety in Maine. Accident Analysis &
<br />Prevention, 2004,36: 533-541•
<br />34. Whirelegg J. Quality oflife and public management: redefining development in the local environment. Oxon,
<br />Rourledge, 2o11.
<br />35• Lancashire County Council. Slowdown to zontph -you could save a life [website] (http://www3.lancashire.
<br />gov.uk/corporate/web/?siLeid=6o;o&pageid=3483o, accessed 17 December zoiz).
<br />36. Ewing R, Dumbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety: a review of empirical evidence. Journal of
<br />Planning Literature, 2.oo9, 2,3: 347-367.
<br />37. Lane PL, ct at. Pedestrians in real world collisions. TheJournal of Trauma, 1994, 36: z31-z36.
<br />38. Lord D, et al. A strategy to reduce older driver injuries at intersections using more accommodating
<br />roundabout design practices. Accident Analysis P9 Prevention, 2007, 39: 42,7-432.
<br />39. Guth D, et al. Blind and sighted pedestrians' judgments of gaps in traffic at roundabouts. Human Factors: The
<br />journal of?he Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1005, 47: 314-331.
<br />40. Crowley-Koch BJ, Houten VR, Lim E. Effects of pedestrian prompts on motorist yielding at crosswalks.
<br />Journal of Applied BebaviorAnalysis, 1011, 44: 1z1-1z6.
<br />41. Lord DA, Smiley A, Haroun A. Pedestrian accidents with left-turning traffic at signalized intersections:
<br />characteristics, human factors and unconsidered issues [website] (http://www.walkinginfo.org/library/details.
<br />cfm?id=3581, accessed 5 January z013).
<br />42,. Koepsell T. Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.
<br />Journal of American Medical Association, zoo z, z88: 2, 136-2143.
<br />43. Zegeer CV. Safety effects of marked vs. unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: Executive summary
<br />and recommendedguidelines. Washington, D.C., Federal Highway Administration (Report No. FHWA-
<br />RD-oi-075), zoo'.
<br />44.Quaye K, et al. Pedestrian accidents and left-turning traffic at signalized intersections. Washington, D.C., AAA
<br />Foundation for Traffic Safety, 1993
<br />45• Chen Y, Meng H, Wang Z. Safety improvement practice for vulnerable road users in Beijing intersections.
<br />TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington D.C., Transportation Research Board, 2.oo9.
<br />46.Jacobsen PL. Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention,
<br />1oo319:z05-z09.
<br />47. Methorst R, et al. Pedestrians'quality needs: final report. Cheltenham, Walkzl, 2,010.
<br />48. Villaveces A, et al. Pedestrians' perceptions of walkability and safety in relation to the built environment in
<br />Cali, Colombia, zoo9-1o.Injury Prevention, zoiz, 18: 2,91-2,97.
<br />49. Behrens R, Jobanputra R. The impact of traffic safety and crime on travel behaviour and attitudes in Cape Town:
<br />a review ofempirical evidence. [Paper presented to International Workshop on Safety, Sustainability and the
<br />Future of Urban Transport, Delhi, 9-11 March, Delhi, zoiz].
<br />50. McLean J. The man in the street pedestrian accidents in the Empire State' In: Proceedings of r5th Annual
<br />Conference, American Association for Automotive Medicine, 1971: 97-111.
<br />51. Buehler R. Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA. Journal of
<br />Transport Geography, 2.oi1, i9: 644-657.
<br />51. Dumbaugh E, Li W. Designing for the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists in the built
<br />environment. Journal ofthe American Planning Association, 1011, 77:69-88.
<br />39
<br />C
<br />B
<br />
|