My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Additional PublicTestimony submitted 3-21-18
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Additional PublicTestimony submitted 3-21-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2018 4:12:59 PM
Creation date
4/2/2018 8:29:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/21/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br />levels. If it is 10 feet or less, use the point (grade level) at the lower side of the house as the point of reference from which <br />to measure 30 feet up for your max. building height. Say that difference is 8 feet. Then 8 plus 22 gets you toAfta lent B <br />height under this scenario is 30 feet all in. Right?? <br />Steep slope situation. Again, a measurement is taken of grade level 5 feet horizontally from the higher side of the <br />proposed house and the lower side of the proposed house. If the vertical distance between these 2 grade levels is <br />greater than 10 feet ...say 15 feet ...the point of reference from which to measure the allowable 30 foot building height is <br />from a point 10 feet higher than the lowest grade at the back of the house. Looking at a "cross section," you'd have 10 <br />feet vertical at the bottom, plus 5 feet vertical to get even with the grade level at the front of house plus 25 feet vertical <br />from there for a max of 40 feet when viewed from the back of the house. Right?? <br />Additionally, EC 9.6720 provides for an additional 7 feet in height for some architectural features and roof structures <br />provided the roof slope is 6:12 or greater. <br />Clear as mud?? Wow. Whoever wrote the definition for "Building Height" and all of its permutations must have been in a <br />really, really bad mood that day!! Can you please confirm that I have correctly stated the two possible scenarios?? <br />Thanks as always for your assistance. <br />Page 119 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.