<br />However, The Response Committee want to ensure that <br />from those three lots is added to adjacent Preservation Areas as follows: <br /> <br />Lot 5 <br />: Reduce the buildable portion of the lot by 3,118 SF so that the buildable portion equals <br />Add the 3,118 SF to the Preservation Area contiguous with the lot. <br />not more than 13,500 SF. <br /> <br />Lot 16: <br /> Reduce the buildable portion of the lot by 2,668 SF so that the buildable portion equals <br />Add the 2,668 SF to the Preservation Area contiguous with the lot. <br />not more than 13,500 SF. <br /> <br />Lot 22: <br /> Reduce the buildable portion of the lot by 4,494 SF so that the buildable portion equals <br />Add the 4,494 SF to Tract C of the so-called Common Area, which <br />not more than 13,500 SF. <br />is contiguous with the lot, so that the large trees in Tract C can be preserved rather than <br />removed. <br /> <br />removed from the buildable square footage of Lots 5, 16 and 22 be included in Recommendation <br />11 of the Conditions of Approval on Page 61 of 62 of the 2/28/18 Staff Report. <br /> <br />#### <br /> <br />The Response Committee retains its position that the three access easements to Lots 5 through 9, <br />Lots 17 and 17, and Lots 18 and 19, especially the two access easements that are 20 feet wide <br />with only a 12 foot wide paving width, are too narrow and unsafe. All pedestrians, bicyclists and <br />physically challenged individuals will be required to walk/ride in these narrow traffic lanes. <br /> <br />Therefore, the Response Committee concludes that the Application does not fully comply with <br />this portion of Criterion 10 and therefore: <br /> <br />THE APPPLICATION SHOULD BE DENIED. <br /> <br />EC 9.6505 (1) Water Supply <br />Staff addresses this Criteria at the top of Page 41 of 62 of the 2/28/18 Staff Report. Staff <br />indicates that: <br />there is sufficient water to supply the proposed Capital Hill PUD. However, the water <br />system is restricted by the existing infrastructure which does not have adequate capacity to <br />provide the required domestic and fire water flows to the proposed development. <br /> <br />The proposed development will require significant upgrades to the EWEB water system, <br />which would include a new pump station and associated piping. <br /> <br />Referral comments from Public Works staff note that prior to final subdivision approval the <br />applicant will need to provide documentation from EWEB ensuring adequate water service. <br /> <br />Therefore Staff has included Recommendation 12 in its Recommended Conditions of Approval <br />on Page 61 of 62 of the 2/28/18 Staff Report, as follows: <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />