4.(8:51) Who is going to pay to bring Capital Drive up to the 21-foot minimum standard? (It <br />was clarified that this question only pertains to the widening of the Capital Drive in front of <br />the development.) <br />Eric -The developer must pay for this improvement. <br />Paul - Is city staff going to recommend, as a condition of approval, that the applicant does this <br />work prior to building permits? Or simply file bonds? <br />Eric - That will all be taken care of during the PEPI Process (Privately Engineered Public <br />Improvement Permit Process), our construction process. It will go through plan review in my <br />department and I’ll be the one reviewing the plans. The work will be bonded so that there is surety <br />that it is done. <br />Paul - Will city staff recommend that, as a condition of any possible Hearings Official approval, <br />the PEPI Process be adhered to as it relates to the widening of Capital Drive? <br />Nick - Yes. Any street widening work will be done in accordance “with” the PEPI Process. <br />(11:16) Paul - Is it staff’s position that you would actually specifically say that the conditions <br />referred to are in accordance with the PEPI process? <br />Nick - I’ll have to go and look; we have done that in the past. <br />Paul - It’s critical that it gets into the conditions of approval. <br />5.(12:31) Has the City taken into account garbage trucks during the cutting down of trees? <br />Currently a fire truck and garbage truck cannot both be on the same road without one being <br />backed down the hill? <br />Eric - No. This is not a requirement in the application process nor is it standard practice. <br />(Sanitation) requires very few trips per month, so there is little impact. <br />Faris - You should be aware that we have photos of a fire truck having to back a significant <br />distance down Spring Blvd. because of a garbage truck. (13:09) <br />Nate - So this is a Fire Department issue? <br />Eric - It’s something they will consider. <br />Paul - Could you make sure consideration of that is put into their (the Fire Department’s) referral <br />comments? <br />Nick - We don’t ask them to put anything in their report – they send comments to us. <br />Faris - So we should talk to the Fire Department? <br />Nick - Yes. Ask them to look at certain things. I think they’re well aware of the issues up there; <br />we’ve had a lot of discussions with them about it and we still are. <br />6.(13:52) Has the city calculated the impact to local roads of trucks, trailers, bulldozers and <br />backhoes to access the project and to cut in the new proposed PUD roads and install the <br />water, sewage, and drains? <br />Eric - No. (See answer to #2 above.) <br />Nick - Just to be clear, we have a set of clear criteria and that’s exactly what we follow when we <br />analyze this. When an issue is not in the criteria, we can’t use it as a way to evaluate this project <br />(14:52). It’s not that we’re trying to get out of what you’re talking about. Sometimes it seems like <br />your considerations are very valid, but if it’s not in the code, we can’t use it. <br />Paul - (15:11) Faris, can I jump the queue, because this point that Nick just made is part of the <br />point about clarifying two of the criteria interms of their scope. Re: EC9.8320 (6)where it <br />addresses that a proposed PUD “cannot be a significant risk to public health & safety…or an <br />impediment to emergency response.” How far down the access road(s) is the City and the Fire <br />Department going to evaluate that criteria? <br />Eric - Just along frontage of the proposed PUD property. That’s why we have adopted local street <br />standards and the Fire Department has acknowledged that that is acceptable. It’s not creating any <br />new issues. <br /> <br />