My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Additional Public Comments as of 3-23-18
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Additional Public Comments as of 3-23-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2018 5:03:57 PM
Creation date
3/23/2018 5:03:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/23/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. According to Eugene code, any structure less than 200 SF may be installed on land without a <br />building permit. Further, there o the number of < 200 SF <br />structures allowed on a lot. Does this mean that sheds, chicken coops, tiny houses, sun <br />shades, vehicle covers, cupolas, patio cover type structures, jungle gyms, plastic yard <br />equipment, etc. can all be erected in the individual preservation areas? Hopefully not. But <br />once again, we are back to the CC&R issue. How many of these types of structures, if any, <br />are allowed on one lot? Were draft CC&Rs available, perhaps answers to some of these <br />questions would be available. <br /> <br />Recommendation 12. This condition requires that, applicant <br />shall provide documentation that EWEB has received a financial guarantee, ensuring water will <br />be provided to each lot in the plat. It is noted that EWEB currently accepts cash, payment, bond, <br />or an irrevocable letter of credit as financial guara <br /> <br />EC 9.6505(1) Water Supply. <br />See Response Committees comments above under <br /> <br />All Recommendations of Approval: The Response Committee questions the exact timing for <br />various recommendations. <br /> <br />On the final plans <br /> <br />Recommendation 8 indicates <br /> <br />Recommendation 10 notes that <br /> <br />Recommendation 11 notes that <br /> <br />Recommendation 12 indicates <br /> <br />Recommendation 13, 14, 15 and 18 indicate <br /> <br />Recommendation 16 and 17 indicate The final plans shall be modified so th <br /> <br />These various above references to points in the approval timeline are ill-defined and confusing. <br />Perhaps Staff can clarify at exactly what point in the numerous steps to approval (if any), <br />adherence to the Staff Recommended Conditions for Approval is required. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.