My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1st Open Record Period: Public Testimony (3-19-18 to 3-21-18)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
1st Open Record Period: Public Testimony (3-19-18 to 3-21-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 9:12:50 AM
Creation date
3/22/2018 1:53:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/21/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.8320 (4) (a) (2) (b) the buildings, <br />Under code states that the Applicant must design <br />road, and other uses to preserve trees having the following characteristics: <br />(1) Healthy trees that have a reasonable chance of survival considering the base zone <br />or special area zone designation and other applicable approval criteria; <br />(2) Trees located within vegetated corridors and stands rather than individual isolated <br />trees subject to windthrow; <br />(3) Trees that fulfill a screening function, provide relief from <br />glare, or shade expansive areas of pavement; <br /> <br />(4)Trees that provide a buffer between potentially incompatible land uses; <br /> <br />(5)Trees located along the perimeter of the lot(s) and within building setback <br />areas; <br /> <br />(6)Trees and stands of trees located along ridgelines and within view corridors; <br /> <br />(7)Trees with significant habitat value; <br /> <br />(8)Trees adjacent to public parks, open space and streets; <br /> <br />(9)Trees located along a water feature; <br /> <br />(10)Heritage trees. <br />As we have argued in the Criteria 4 section of the Joint Response Committee document <br />and in post-hearing submitted testimony, the Applicant has failed to satisfy 1,4,5,6,7 and <br />8 of the above criteria. Of the 401 trees that the Applicant proposes to preserve in the <br />Tree Preservation Plan, 58% are not healthy by the ApplicantÈs own assessment. The <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.