1st Open Record Period: Staff Memos with attachments

above 701 feet (and below 900) that do not include creation of a public street do not require a PUD. It is therefore apparent, based on the map provided by the applicant, that the property could be partitioned to create two to three additional parcels without requiring PUD approval. Staff notes that the assumption that a street would not be required for a partition is reasonable considering the exceptions to street connectivity otherwise recommended for the Capital Hill PUD in this area. applicant materials to demonstrate compliance are before the City), the applicant may apply for a partition of the existing legal lot into two or three parcels that would meet the applicable lot standards at EC 9.2760 and EC 9.2775 (for flag lots). Such an application could be made under the using track for Tentative Partition approval at EC 9.8220. For example, it appears possible that one regular single-family lot (a front lot) and two flag lots (to the rear of the front lot) could be proposed in this area under the clear and objective criteria of the Needed Housing track at EC 9.8220. Of particular note and emphasis, such an application would not be subject to any limitation on grading of 20% slopes or greater. Staff Response to Question Regarding Goal 5 Scenic Areas Map: As stated in the February 28, 2018 staff report (page 20): inventory, per the April 12, 1978 Scenic Sites Working Paper, which designates the subject site as Natural Sites of Visual Prominence and Prominent and Plentiful Vegetation. As such, the provisions of EC 9.8320(4)(a)(2) are applicable to the proposed tentative PUD. Staff has provided below a copy of Figure H 2 of the April 12, 1978 Scenic Sites Working Paper, for clarification and the full copy is provided along with the adopting ordinance as Attachment B: 3