My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1st Open Record Period: Public Testimony (3-7-18 to 3-19-18)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
1st Open Record Period: Public Testimony (3-7-18 to 3-19-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 4:01:42 PM
Creation date
3/19/2018 4:05:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/19/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p, <br />Gregory G. Foote <br />Senior Judge <br />State of Oregon <br />Virginia Gustafson-Lucker, Eugene Hearing Officer <br />City, of Eugene <br />99 West 10" Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />RE: Capital Hill PUD <br />March 9, 2018 <br />Dear Ms. Gustafson-Lucker: <br />2930 Capital Drive <br />Eugene, OR 97403 <br />(541) 485-6259 <br />,Received <br />MAR 12 2018 <br />City of Eugene <br />Planning Division <br />I have lived on Capital Drive, directly across from the "pink house" owned by Tom and Cynthia <br />Dreyer for nearly 30 years, and have closely followed the progress of their proposed PUD. T have <br />not stated a public position on this issue and do not intend to do so. I do, however, wish to <br />express displeasure at what I see as the demonization of the Dreyers, whom I know to be good <br />neighbors. <br />I have always assumed that the Dreyer property (formerly owned by the late Charmian Byers- <br />Jones) would someday be developed, and was pleased to learn that it would be my neighbors <br />who did so, rather than some disinterested out-of-town developer. I believe Tom and Cindy have <br />listened to city planning staff, landscape experts, traffic engineers, and, most importantly, their <br />neighbors, in an effort to take into consideration their input for the project, which is now the <br />result of many compromises and changes. They have been nothing but open-minded and <br />approachable, and do not deserve the personal attacks I have seen coming from some who <br />oppose the project. <br />Tom Dreyer has made an exhaustive study of the sociological ramifications of land use planning, <br />and has an admittedly idealistic vision for this PUD. Rather than people living in isolated <br />McMansions, he wants a vibrant neighborhood of families who know each other, look out for <br />each other's kids, and watch each other's houses when they are away. He wants kids trick-or- <br />treating and selling Girl Scout cookies and riding their bikes, and a mix of young and old. <br />Reasonable minds can differ (and I hope respectfully) as to whether this ambitious vision is <br />realistic or can be reflected in this PUD. But I suggest that it is not that of an unscrupulous <br />developer, but rather someone who earnestly desires the best for his neighborhood. <br />Sincer , <br />Gregory Foote <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.