My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
combinationofmodestdevelopmentandtheexistingvegetationinHendricksPark <br />provideseffectivescreeningforthedevelopment.” <br />And:“Differentthanabuttingprivateproperty,thatissubjecttoprivatedevelopment,the <br />screeningthatHendricksParkprovidesislikelytobethereforaverylongtime.” <br />TheCommitteebelievesthattheApplicationhasreversedthemeaningof“screening.” <br />TheobjectivehereistoscreenHendricksParkfromtheproposeddevelopment;notthe <br />otherwayaround.Also,theparkwilllikelyadjustinthefutureasEugene’sdemand <br />foropenspaceincreases.Futureparktrailscouldeasilybebuiltclosertotheproject’s <br />boundary. <br />Further,afterportionsofthesubjectpropertyareclearcutforhomes,thesouthernedgeof <br />HendricksParkcouldbedramaticallyimpactedbywindthroworotherenvironmental <br />damage,thinningoutorcompletelydestroyingtheso-called“screening”thattheparkitself <br />mayprovide. <br />OnPage35of67,the8/22/17Applicationfurtherstates: <br />“ThesouthpropertylinecontainsTractE,whichisa25-footwidepieceofpropertythat <br />willbededicatedtotheCityofEugenefordevelopmentofaconnectiontotheRibbon <br />trail.Thisdedicationeffectivelyseparatesthedevelopmentsitefromtheabutting <br />properties.” <br />TheCommitteepointsout: <br />1)ThesouthernpropertylineDOESNOTcontainaTractE.Thestatementthatitdoesis <br />completelyfalse. <br />2)Moreover,a25footwidepieceofproperty,nomatterhowheavilywooded,wouldnot <br />providesufficientscreening,especiallyinthewintermonthswhenalloftheleavesare <br />down,fortwostoryhomesthatcouldeasilybebuiltthroughouttheproposedproject. <br />#### <br />TheApplicationclosesitsdiscussionofCriterion3atthebottomofPage35of67withthe <br />following: <br />“Preservationofexistingtreesandtheadditionofnewtreesontheprojectsitewill <br />ultimatelycomewiththedevelopmentoftheproperties,whichwillintegratenew <br />developmentwithexistingdevelopmentandcontext.” <br />Theabovestatementimpliesthatthearea’senvironmentalcondition,especiallyasitrelates <br />totrees,willonlyimproveafterbuildoutoftheproposedproject…andthataccompanying <br />that“improvement”intrees,willbeanintegrationoftheprojectintothesurrounding <br />neighborhoodwithitsmanyalreadymaturetrees. <br />45 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.