My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TheApplicationfailstopreserveintermediateslopesandfailstomitigatethevisual <br />impactofthesiteasseenfromtheRibbonTrailandontheridgeline,asviewedfrom <br />downtownEugeneandtotheeastfromLaurelHillValley. <br />TheApplication(p.28of67)assertsthatthere"willbeminimaltreeremovalatthehighest <br />elevations.".Thereare257treescountedabove901'(30%ofthetotaltreescounted),manyof <br />themthelargesttreesontheproperty.ManyofthelargestfirtreesontheproposedCHPUDsite, <br />someinexcessof40inchesindiameter,willberemovedfortheROW(rightofway) <br />constructionorhomeconstruction.Inshort,theApplicationproposesextensivetreeremoval <br />alongtheridgeline—themostvisiblepartoftheproposedCHPUDasseenfrommultiple <br />locationsacrossthecityofEugeneandLaurelHillValley. <br />TheapplicationdoesnotsatisfyEC9.9630(3)(b)andshouldbedenied. <br />(c)Thatadequatereviewofbothon-siteandoff-siteimpactofanydevelopmentbya <br />qualifiedengineeringgeologistoccurunderanyofthefollowingconditions: <br />TheproposedCHPUDrepresentsasignificantthreattothestabilityoftheslopeabovethe <br />RibbonTrailandLaurelHillValley.Thecuttingoftreesthatnormallyabsorbwaterand <br />stabilizeslopes,thebuildingofhomesonsteepslopes,andtheredirectingofwaterflowexpose <br />theeasternslopeoftheproposedCHPUDtocatastrophiclandslide.Furthergeologicalstudyis <br />necessarytodetermineifthelotsontheeasternsideoftheproposedCHPUDaresafefor <br />construction.Seefurtherdiscussionunder EC9.8320(6)p.71and EC9.8320(10)(d)p.109. <br />(e)Thatdevelopmentsbereviewedintermsofscale,bulkandheighttoinsurethat <br />developmentblendswithratherthandominatesthenaturalcharacteristicsofthe <br />southhillsarea. <br />DuetothelackofwrittenHOABylawsandCCRsthatspeaktothestatedintentionsofthe <br />CHPUDTreeConservationPlan,thereisnowayofprotectingandpreservingthetreesidentified <br />for“conservation”intheapplication.Accordingto EC6.305 and EC6.330,“Ifthepropertyis <br />partofanapprovedsubdivision,plannedunitdevelopment,sitereview,orconditionalusepermit <br />thatincludesatreeremoval/preservationplanorconditionsrelatedtotreeremoval…the <br />approvedplansregulatethetreeremovalprocess.”TheApplicationstates(p.30of67),“Itis <br />prematuretobepreparingcovenantsandrestrictionsand\[at\]thispointintheprocess",but <br />offersnoexplanationwhyitispremature.IntheabsenceofCCRsordeedrestriction,the <br />applicationdoesnotofferanyguaranteesorinstrumentsthatmemorializeandprovide <br />enforcementfortheirtreepreservationplan. <br />TheApplicationoffersnomitigationwithregardtohousingstyleandcharacter,inpartbecause <br />theplanismoreofalanddivisionthanaPUD.EC9.9630 specificallystipulatesthata <br />developerseekingtobuildabove901'intheSouthHillsStudyareamusteitherrestrict <br />themselvestobuildingonexistinglotsordevelopthelandunderaPUDapplication. <br />29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.