My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 26 of 67 of the 8/22/17 EC 9.2750 and Page 56 of 67 of <br />the 8/22/17 Application <br />1/19/18 Site Plan L 6.01/19/18 Site Plan L 2.0 <br />Source <br />Two <br />Application. <br />description Single Family Home Lots "Landscaping as per CC&Rs and Review by Architectural Review : There are NO individual tax lots located WITHIN Preservation Areas. THE placing individual <br /> preservation areas within some 8/22/17 written Application, maintenance of the Individual Tax Lot Preservation Areas is attributed : Per EC 9.2750 in Zone R-hillsides. EC 9.2750 <br /> does not indicate a limit on <br />additional 10 -17 feet allowed for lots on steep <br />REVERSE IS TRUE. The proposed PUD proposes <br />1, building height is limited to 30 feet, with an <br />: Site Plan L 6.0 dated <br />: On Page 26 of the <br />1/19/18 indicates (top middle) under the <br />Issue <br />Inaccurate InformationInaccurate InformationInaccurate InformationInaccurate Informationthe number of stories. <br />CAPITAL HILL PUD - INCONSISTENCIES OF APPLICATION ( August 22, 2017 Application and Supporting Materials) <br />Page 11 of 11 <br />Committee." <br />to the HOA. <br />tax lots. <br /> Page 7 of the 11/27/2017 letter from Carol Schirmer to Nick some of the property in preservation areas to be managed preservation areas to be managed by the individual property some <br /> of the property in preservation areas to be managed to be managed by the individual property indicates on Pages 5 and 6 of 9 (bottom & middle) that "The zoning is r-1 \[sic\] , the <br /> building height is limited to 25 feet (2 <br />indicates on Page 2 of 9 that "the plans call for "putting indicates on Page 2 of 9 that "the plans call for "putting <br /> The 6/19/17 letter from Carol Schirmer to Nick Gioello The 6/19/17 letter from Carol Schirmer to Nick Gioello The 6/19/17 letter from Carol Schirmer to Nick Gioello <br />(Landscape Standards) that "There are no landscaping <br />stories) and that buildings will not exceed that height." <br />Giolello \[sic\] indicates, in its discussion of EC 9.6205 <br />by the HOA and some of the individual tax lots in by the HOA and some of the individual tax lots in <br />standards for proposed single family lots." <br />Item <br />preservation areas <br />owner."owner." <br />11/27/17 Letter Schirmer to N. 6/19/17 Letter Schirmer to N. 6/19/17 Letter Schirmer to N. 6/19/17 Letter Schirmer to N. <br />3/5/2018 <br />Source <br />One <br />from C. from C. from C. from C. <br />GioelloGioelloGioelloGioello <br />No. <br />65666768 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.