Page 27 of 67 of the 8/22/17 <br />Page 35 of 67 of 8/22/17 <br />1/19/18 Site Plan L 2.01/19/18 Site Plan L 2.0 <br />Source <br />Site visit & photos. <br />Two <br />Local knowledge. <br />Application.Application. <br /> Instead of the maximum A 6 foot fence is character of the slopes to the east of the project is Page 35 (upper) states "No buildings elevations have been shown as this is an exercise <br /> in guessing ..." How can the Application through the trees" in one spot and "No building OPEN SPACE..." "It" refers to Tract A (approx. 46 ft. wide) & City Land (approx. 92 ft. <br /> wide) = 150 foot width. Only one lot (Lot 17) on the Site Plan has an Individual Tax Lot Preservation Area = 150 ft. wide. Lot 17 is at the other end of the project. <br />the proposed project is west of Friendly Street, and east of Friendly Street, the level for east of <br />: The Application states <br />levels of new development per gross acre west <br />densely overgrown, steep and dangerous. The <br />project. The animation "still" is incorrect. The <br />WHICH IS FAR FROM "PROVIDING A 150 FOOT <br />proposed along the entire eastern edge of the elevations have been shown" just a few pages <br />say "Some of the proposed houses are visible <br />. AT ITS VERY <br />. The actual <br />NARROWEST "IT" IS ONLY 12.5 FEET WIDE, <br />Application NEVER mentions the proposed <br />Missing/Inaccurate Information. <br />Friendly Street was given twice. <br />animation portral is incorrect. <br />Missing/Inaccurate InformationMissing/Inaccurate Information <br />Issue <br />not east. East is correct. <br />Inaccurate Information. <br />Inaccurate Information <br />CAPITAL HILL PUD - INCONSISTENCIES OF APPLICATION ( August 22, 2017 Application and Supporting Materials) <br />Missing Information. <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />fencing. <br />later? <br />On Page 27, Under Development Standards for SHS (9.9630 On Page 27, the Application repeats the "purpose" language On Page 29 (animation "still"), the character of the slopes to "still," <br /> the application states "Some of the proposed houses On Page 30 (upper), the Application uses the pronoun "it" to Application states "At its very narrowest, "it" provides a 150- <br />On Page 29 of the Application, in discussing the animated <br />foot open space between the development site and the <br />On Page 29 (animation "still"), no 6 foot fence is shown <br />refer to the Individual Tax Lot Preservation Areas. The <br />the east of the project is portrayed as maintained, <br />(3)), the Application transposes east & west. <br />along the edge of the property line. <br />are barely visible through the trees." <br />somewhat manicured & bucolic. <br />Item <br />from #1 in the section on #2. <br />Ribbon Trail." <br />Page 27 of 67Page 27 of 67Page 29 of 67Page 29 of 67Page 29 of 67Page 30 of 67 <br />3/5/2018 <br />Source <br />One <br />272729292930 <br />No. <br />202122232425 <br /> <br />