TheadjoiningpropertiesonCapitalDr.alongthe125linearfeetofgravelroadwaywillnotbe <br />abletoconnecttotheproposeddevelopment’sstreetsystem. <br />Seeadditionalcommentsregarding EC9.6505Improvements–Specifications(3)Streetsand <br />Alleys inthefinalsectionsofthisresponseDocument <br />#### <br />EC9.2760LotArea. <br />The8/22/17ApplicationstatesinthemiddleofPage59of67:“Lots5,14-19and20,22and23 <br />exceedthelotareamaximumof13,500sf.Inthiscase,thelotareamaximumisexceededto <br />preserveexistingnaturalfeaturesandhomes.”(Emphasisadded.) <br />TheCommitteepointsoutthatfromtheabove10largelotsindicatedbytheApplicationas <br />having“naturalfeatures&homes,”onlytwo,infact,dohaveexistinghomes.Additionally,Lot <br />4(a21,807SFlotwithanexisting2,811SFresidencenotated“existingbuildingtoremain”on <br />the1/19/18SitePlanL2.0)ismissingfromthelistof10largelotsonPage59of67ofthe <br />Application.The21,807SFLot4exceedstheCity’s13,500SFresidentialmaximumSFby <br />61%.Whyhasn’tthislotbeenincluded? <br />WhycannottheApplicantandhisConsultantgettheirfactsstraight?ThroughoutthisResponse <br />Document,theCommitteehaspointedoutinconsistencies,falsehoods,andcarelesspresentation <br />thatunderminestheintegrityandveracityoftheentireApplication. <br />The8/22/17Application,onPage59of67,proceedswith: <br />“Aspreviouslymentionedinthiswrittenstatement,certainlotswithinthePUDaregreater <br />thanthelotareamaximumprimarilytocreateandmaintainconservationzones.These <br />zoneswillberegulatedandmaintainedbytheHOAtoensurethenaturalareais <br />appropriatelypreserved.Theconservationareacomponentofthelotwillbeprotectedfrom <br />developmentandwillpreservetreesandvegetation,aswellasprovideaforestedbuffer <br />betweenthePUDandRibbonTrail.”(Emphasisadded.) <br />TheCommitteeagainremindsthereaderthatthelotsalongtheeasternedgeoftheproposed <br />projectdonotcontainextrasquarefootageto“createandmaintainconservationzones.”These <br />so-calledIndividualTaxLotPreservationAreashavebeentackedontotheindividuallotsto <br />increaselotpricestothebenefitoftheApplicant.Theseareascould(andshould)bepartofthe <br />HOA’sPreservationAreasotheirmanagementishandleddirectlybytheHOAandnotthrough <br />anintermediary,i.e.,theindividualowneroftheland. <br />The8/27/17Application,onPages59and60,furtherstates:“Thepreservationzonesforthelots <br />exceedingthemaximumlotsizecontainingpreservationzones\[sic\]areasfollows:” <br />(CommitteeNote:ThisisarepeatoftheinformationonPage50of67ofthe8/22/17 <br />Application.) <br />156 <br /> <br />