activitiesorotherwiseunwelcomeactivitiesinthisneighborhood.”Thiswouldclearlynotbethe <br />caseifnostreetlightswillbeinstalled. <br />Thelackoflightingwillalsogiveafalsesenseofsecurityforwildlifeandwillincreasethe <br />likelihoodof“carvs.deer”encounters,whichmostdefinitelydoesn’tpromotethewell-beingof <br />wildlifeorthesafetyofresidents. <br />Thelackofcommunitylightingisalsoadisasterfromauniformityofdesignstandpoint.Ifeach <br />individualhomeownerhastheoptiontochooselightingforthestreetandcommunitysidewalks <br />infrontoftheirresidence,thestreetviewatnightwillbearandomcollectionofbulbintensities <br />andcolors,lightingheightsanddesigncharacteristics.Thesearenotthecharacteristicsofaso- <br />called“elegant”or“thoughtful”design.PerhapsCC&Rswilladdressthisissue.Itisimpossible <br />tosay,becausealthoughtheCommitteehasquestionedtheCityseveraltimesaboutthelackof <br />CC&Rs,theApplicantandhisConsultanthaverefusedtocreatedraftCC&Rs. <br />Additionally,indiscussing EC9.6730PedestrianCirculationOn-Site,Section3Designof <br />On-SitePedestrianFacilities,forsubsections(b)through(d),theApplication’scomments <br />that“Compliancewiththiscriterionwillbeevaluatedattimeofbuildingpermitsubmittal.” <br />ThesethreecriteriadealwithconstructionofpedestrianpathsincompliancewiththeAmericans <br />withDisabilitiesAct;heightofpedestrianpathsadjacenttostreets;andmarkingofpedestrian <br />pathsforcrossingareas. <br />WhyistheApplicationunabletoaddressthesecriteriaatthistime?Thisisespecially <br />shortsightedgiventhattheApplicationboastsabouttheconstructionoftwosidewalks(along <br />CapitalDr.andCupolaDr.)aspartofsitedevelopmentplansthatensuresafetyforthe <br />community.Bydelayinganycompliancereviewforsidewalkconstructionuntilvertical <br />buildingplansaresubmitted,theApplicationimpliesthatcommunitysidewalkconstructionwill <br />be“piecemeal”andwillnotbecompleteduntilallhomesarebuilt.Ifthisisthecase,theseveral <br />yearsthatmayberequiredforcompletebuildoutoftheproposedPUDwillbeperilousforall <br />residentsandfortheentirecommunity. <br />Therefore,theApplicationisnotincompliancewithseveralsub-sectionswithinEC9.6730 <br />PedestrianCirculationOn-Site. <br />THEAPPLICATIONSHOULDBEDENIED. <br />#### <br />Criteria(10).ThePUDcomplieswith…thefollowing: <br />(f)EC9.6735PublicAccessRequired. <br />(1)Exceptasotherwiseprovidedinthislandusecode,nobuildingorstructureshallbe <br />erectedoralteredexceptonalotfrontingorabuttingonapublicstreetorhaving <br />accesstoapublicstreetoveraprivatestreetoreasementofrecordapprovedin <br />accordancewithprovisionscontainedinthislandusecode. <br />118 <br /> <br />