TheResponseCommittee’spositiononthisissueisthatthe“achievability”ofEugene’smulti- <br />familyresidentialdevelopmentcodestandardsmustbeknownbeforetheApplicationis <br />consideredcompleteandtheApplicantisabletomarketlotsformulti-familyunits.Ifthisisnot <br />thecase,theproposedPUD’sofferingofmulti-familylotstopotentialbuyersisashamandthe <br />“planned”inthephrasePlannedUnitDevelopmentisvoidofmeaning. <br />TheCommitteefurtheremphasizesthatacode-compliantresolutiontothismulti-family <br />developmentissueisreliantuponsiteplanconfiguration.Shouldtheconfigurationofasiteplan <br />(thetentativeapprovalofwhichtheApplicationrequestsatthistime)precludemulti-familycode <br />compliance,oneoftheApplication’smajortenets(constructionofaffordablemulti-family <br />housing)becomesimpossibletoaccomplish. <br />TheResponseCommitteehasaparticularconcernregardingthefeasibilityofconstructinganon- <br />sitepedestrianpathfrompossiblemulti-familyunitsonLots16and17toLots18and19. <br />ToreachLots18and19,potentialmulti-familyresidentslivingoneitherLot16or17willbe <br />requiredtowalkalongtheapproximate134footlengthofthemotorvehicleaccesseasement <br />(siteplanshowsonlya12ft.pavingwidthwithnosidewalk)toCupolaDr.;crossCupolaDr.to <br />thesidewalk;proceedwestapprox.310feetalongtheCupolaDr.sidewalk;re-crossCupola <br />Drive;proceedoff-sitesouthonCapitalDr.forabout445feet(steepandslipperywithno <br />sidewalkalongahairpincurve)totheon-siteaccesseasementleadingtoLots18and19;then, <br />oncebackon-site,finallywalknorthwestforapproximately92feetalongthemotorvehicle <br />accesseasement(also12ft.pavingwidthwithnosidewalk)totheirdestination. <br />115 <br /> <br />