As far the second point is concerned, addingwaterto an already unstable slope is NEVER a good <br />idea. And in this case, <br />the discharge is proposed to occurdirectly above the larger of the two <br />active slides mapped by DOGAMI below the central portion of the proposed PUD. That slide <br />is mapped less than 200’ from the proposed location of the level spreaders. <br />According to their geotechnical assessment report and addendum, it appears that Branch Engineering <br />did not perform assessment of the conditions at or below the proposed location of the level <br />any <br />spreader stormwater discharge point. Therefore, the only information that can be utilized is <br />DOGAMI’s map, which clearly indicates a slide directly below the discharge point. Of course, since <br />DOGAMI’s map was generated mostly using remote sensing techniques, it is likely that they missed <br />other slide areas in the immediate vicinity of this dip-slope system. So it is unlikely that therewill <br />be any area along the eastern boundary of the proposed PUD where it would be appropriate to use <br />this method of stormwater discharge. <br />9 <br />Capital Hill PUD Geotechnical Review, GeoScience, Inc. 3/7/18 <br /> <br />