My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony (Opposition)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Testimony (Opposition)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 9:08:26 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 11:42:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
as opposed to somebody from out of the area," he said. "We want to protect Hendricks <br />Park." <br />Residents in the Laurel Hill and Fairmount neighborhoods have been paying close atten- <br />tion. Residents from each area's neighborhood association were scheduled to meet with <br />Dreyer in February to talk about the plan, but a massive snowstorm that week meant only a <br />handful of people attended. <br />Still, Laurel Hill Valley Citizens Co-Chair Gunnar Schlieder said in an email, the meeting <br />prompted his group and the Fairmount Neighbors Association to form a joint committee. <br />About 50 people from the neighborhoods met with Dreyer again last month. <br />Schlieder said Dreyer told them he would reveal new plans for the development within the <br />next few months. <br />But Schlieder declined to go into detail about his or other neighbors' feelings or concerns <br />about the plan. <br />"Until a <br />new proposal <br />is presented, there are no specific comments we can <br />provide," he <br />said. A <br />message left <br />with the Fairmount <br />Neighbors Association wasn't <br />immediately <br />returned. <br />In a Laurel Hill Valley Citizens newsletter earlier this year, Schlieder wrote that "substan- <br />tive discussion regarding the potential impacts of this (proposal) will not be possible until <br />actual plans become available." <br />The annexation proposal is the only active document on file with city, and doesn't go into <br />detail about the proposal. <br />Carol Schirmer, the Dreyers' land use planner, said it's unusual for a developer not to have a <br />timeline for a project. She's worked on several student housing projects, where developers <br />essentially had building plans before even finalizing sites to build on. <br />Though none of the project's specifics are set in stone, the annexation request shows the <br />couple is serious about moving forward, she said. <br />"Most people don't annex property unless they're going to develop," she said. "The Dreyers <br />have a real solid vision." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.