GIOELLO Nick R <br />From: Paul Conte <paul.t.conte@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 10:43 AM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Cc: SOMMERS Lauren A <br />Subject: PDT 17-1 Testimony Whitepaper "Conformance versus Exaction <br />Attachments: Conformance versus Exaction May 6 2018.pdf <br />Nick, <br />Please acknowledge receipt and include the attached PDF document in the record for PDT 17-1. <br />Conformance versus Exaction May 6 2018. pdf <br />You and Lauren should read this closely so that y'all understand the proper way that legal and <br />planning staff should be advising the HO and EPC regarding potential conditions of approval to <br />ensure conformance with EC 9.8320(5)(b) in particular i.e., that there must be at least one <br />sidewalk extending down Capital Lane for at least 1 /4 mile from the lower boundary of the <br />proposed PUD to separate pedestrians from motorized vehicles. This would not require an <br />exaction! <br />Let me know if you have any questions. <br />Paul <br />Accredited Earth Advantage <br />Sustainable Homes Professional <br />