GIOELLO Nick R <br />From: Paul Conte <paul,t,conte@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 2:47 PM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Subject: Inconsistent versions of code in PWD referral and Staff report <br />Please add this to the record for PDT 17-1. <br />You've got a problem. <br />The PW Referral Report and the Staff Report appear to have review the application using different <br />versions of Eugene Code. That, of course, makes on or the other unreliable as a credible review. <br />This raises the issue to preserve for future appeal. <br />Good luck! <br />Paul Conte <br />1461 W. 10th Ave <br />Eugene, OR 97402 <br />Page 9 of "Public Works Referral Response" dated November 30, 2017 - revised 2-1-18 <br />(11) The PUD complies with all of the following (An approved adjustment to a standard <br />pursuant to the provision beginning at EC 9,8015 of this land use code constitutes <br />compliance with the standard.): <br />Page 37 of February 2018 "Staff Report" <br />EC 9.83201101: The PUD complies with all of the following (An approved adjustment <br />to a standard pursuant to the provisions beginning at EC 9.8015 of this sand use code <br />constitutes compliance with the standard.): <br />Accredited Earth Advantage <br />Sustainable Homes Professional <br />