GIOELLO Nick R <br />From: <br />Brent Lorscheider <lorsch2728@pacbell.net> <br />Sent: <br />Monday, March 05, 2018 12:14 PM <br />To: <br />GIOELLO Nick R; RODRIGUES Matt J <br />Cc: <br />Brent Lorscheider; Gyl Elliott; Faris Cassell; Tom Bruno; CW Murchison; Nathaniel Teich <br />Subject: <br />Withdrawing Capital Hill Parking Petitions <br />Attention: Matt Rodriguez and Nick Gioello, March 3, 2108 <br />As the chief petitioner for the Capital Drive Parking petitions (July 2017 and Dec 2017), I witnessed and attest that each signature <br />indicated support for Parking Services to investigate parking issues in the 2600 block of Capital Drive. The City is now <br />misrepresenting the petitions as "Capital Hill PUD Public Comments" and using the petitions to justify the City's decision to eliminate <br />parking on Capital Drive. By eliminating parking the city can claim to address and remove fire department concerns, which help <br />justify approval of thePUD application. Therefore, as the chief petitioner I withdraw the petitions and demand the petitions be <br />removed from the official Public Comments of the Capital Hill Planned Unit Development application. <br />I submitted the petitions to the Parking Enforcement Office hoping to raise concerns about parking issues from Airbnbs and rental <br />guests in the 2600 block of Capital Drive--the petitions did not request the elimination of any parking. <br />The City's misrepresentation of the petitions as public comments on the proposed Capital Hill PUD, is INCORRECT, and does a <br />disservice to everyone that signed the petitions. The petitions do not mention the Cap Hill PUD, nor were the petitions submitted to <br />the Planning Department as "public comments" on the PUD . <br />Sincerely, <br />Brent Lorscheider 2625 Capital Drive. <br />