My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony (Opposition)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Testimony (Opposition)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 9:08:26 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 11:42:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
street. To quote the FED EX driver in this neighborhood, "There are close calls everyday!" <br />To plan for more cars, trucks, pedestrians and cyclists using Spring Boulevard without <br />sidewalks is irresponsible! Risking serious injury should not be required to fulfill housing <br />demand. <br />Please consider that this is a very stable neighborhood with long-term residents who <br />understand the limitations of Spring Boulevard as an access. This helps to mitigate safety <br />issues. We slow way down around blind curves. We know there could be pedestrians or <br />bicyclists around aU curve. We plan for this every time we travel up or down the hill. <br />Safety concerns increase when children, the elderly and the disabled are asked to share the <br />roadway with cars. Whatever the law requires of motorists sharing the roadway with <br />pedestrians and cyclists, the experience of Spring Boulevard neighbors and users is of <br />many cars passing pedestrians and bikes at the 25 MPH statutory speed limit. <br />There are the people who live in our neighborhood, and those who pass through it. The <br />proposed CHPUD will substantially add to the latter. CHPUD neighbors might not consider <br />the elements of `neighborhood awareness', as those we discuss here for Spring Boulevard. <br />We bring this up because the impact CHPUD neighbors will have on the roads and <br />neighborhoods, will be felt by people all the way down the hill, not just the 1/4 mile that is <br />mandated to be studied by City code. The risks on Spring Boulevard increase with unaware <br />or new users of the roadway. <br />The bottom line for us is, cars sharing the roadway with pedestrians and bicyclists is <br />fundamentally unsafe. Any person who thinks that more traffic with more pedestrians and <br />cyclists is safe should experience walking or biking up or down Spring Boulevard in the <br />dark around dinnertime in the winter. It can be very frightening for all! We know from <br />experience that pedestrians are required to jump at a moment's notice into the bushes to <br />avoid being hit in the roadway. On the uphill side of the street there is not even room to <br />stand on the curb. Is this the street that you would allow your child or grandparent to share <br />with construction vehicles and trucks? A new neighborhood will increase the potential for <br />unsafe conditions. We should not sacrifice safety for housing. We recommend the City deny <br />the CHPUD application. <br />Respectfully, <br />John Curtis and Janne Underriner, Associate Professor of Research, University of Oregon <br />2362 Malabar Drive <br />Eugene, Oregon 97403 <br />Please enter this document into the CHPUD application record. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.