My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICANT ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT (1 of 2)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
APPLICANT ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT (1 of 2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 10:35:45 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:35:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Supplemental Materials
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DECISION OF THE HEARINGS OFFICIAL <br />FOR THE CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON <br /> <br />APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE PLANNING <br />DIRECTOR APPROVING SITE REVIEW <br /> <br /> <br />Application Summary <br />: <br />Appeal of planning director approval of site review for 106 multi-family apartment units. <br />Applicant: <br />Brenelaine Investments, LLC. <br />Appellant: <br />Steve Norris/River Road Community Organization <br />Lead City Staff: <br />Erik Berg-Johansen, Associate Planner. <br />Subject Property/Zoning/Location: <br />The subject pro-04-14-32; <br />located adjacent to Howard Avenue and North Park Avenue. The property is zoned GO General <br />Office, SR Site Review Overlay, WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay, and R-2 <br />Medium-Density Residential. <br />Relevant Dates: <br />Application submitted on January 9, 2017 and deemed complete on July 3, 2017; planning director <br />decision issued on August 17, 2017; Appeal of planning director decision filed August 30, 2017. <br />Public hearing held September 27, 2017. <br />Summary of the Public Hearing <br /> <br />ed <br />approval of the site review applicationsentatives testified in favor of the <br />application. The appellant testified in opposition to the application. A number of citizens testified <br />in opposition to the application. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the record was closed. <br />Documents Considered by the Hearings Official <br /> <br />Application Materials <br />Planning Director Decision <br /> <br />Hearings Official Decision (SR 17-2) 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.